Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Suppose someone is good at solving a category of problems.

He will solve all his own problems in that category, and fewer outside it.

So of course, after he's spent a long time trying to solve his own problems, the remainder will be ones he's bad at.

But for other people, lots of their problems will be the kinds he's good at.



Another factor is that people literally aren't aware of their personal problems, only of some of distant consequences. If anything, smartness acts to cover up the evidence via rationalization.

Friends know about some of them, but they tend to discuss these only in one's absence ("the problem with X is that he is always [blank]", etc.)


Amen to that. Friends sometimes try to bring that up only to be shot down instantly with some smart rationalization. Thanks.


Reminds me of this article recently posted on HN:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/we-are-all-talk-ra...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: