Your reference, [1], refers to documents from Guccifer 2.0, which Salon uses to extrapolate that "emails hacked from the Hillary Clinton campaign may not have been as reliable as the anti-Clinton camp would like to believe." But then there's this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys_Identified_Mail#Non....
As far as damaging e-mails from the other side, they would probably need to go further than: mocking people with disabilities, attacking gold star families, insulting POWs, admitting to sexual assault, etc. because all of that is on tape.
Not all of the emails were signed. I haven't seen any evidence that even most of the damaging emails were signed.
Additionally there are several attacks potentially available to state actors to forge those signatures. The most probable is to steal the server's private key.
>As far as damaging e-mails from the other side,
How about agreeing to take a meeting with a Russian agent?
Trump only won by about 80k votes in 3 states. The election was very close--a change in weather could've swung it.
You can Google Russian involvement with Pizzagate. It was mostly Russian linked bots retweeting it to push it into trending.
In addition to Russian bots, all the Turkish pro government newspapers were spreading Pizzagate conspiracies.
As far as damaging e-mails from the other side, they would probably need to go further than: mocking people with disabilities, attacking gold star families, insulting POWs, admitting to sexual assault, etc. because all of that is on tape.
As far as Russia being involved with the pizza nonsense, I'd like to see some citations on that. Here's one accounting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory#Ge...