I think the most logical/useful place for a camera on a watch is embedded in the band, approximately 90 degrees from the face. I would not be surprised to see swappable "camera bands" available for future generations of the Apple Watch.

> Why can't you just enjoy that something interesting there and then?

You know, it is possible to enjoy something and capture it too.

> Do we really need to capture everything and share it with everyone?

No we don't. You're putting words into the author's mouth.

Some people have a creative impulse. They get inspiration and want to express what they're feeling or get an urge to make something. And he doesn't even mention sharing the photo.

My comment was slightly tongue in cheek as I get where he is coming from. I suppose it could be an optional feature, or a way to differentiate the product.

He doesn’t really need a watch either then? If you concede it’s a gadget review for something you don’t strictly need, why not indulge him?

I suppose so. I guess I'm just arguing this is a bizarre feature request.

He is out on a run. Will it need a separate processor for image stabilization because he is running?

I love having a camera with me everywhere I go. I love seeing something weird or amazing and being able to share that with my friends or family in seconds.

There is value in not letting devices control us, but there is also value in shared experiences that were previously impossible.

I understand- and I am in two minds whether this would be a good thing or not- especially because of the control aspect of it.

You could share it by talking about it.

I was being sarcastic. Should have put a `/s` on there I guess.

I put in the comment and I then I thought you probably were :).