> Refusing to rebroadcast or support the opinions of someone you don't like is at present not a crime, and I sincerely hope it stays that way.

Even when the shoe is on the other foot, e.g. a baker who does not want to disseminate interracial or same-sex wedding cake?

Deferring to "that is a crime" is no help because your argument is that it should not be a crime to refuse to disseminate speech you don't like.

There is no principled way to draw a line here. Either you don't compel speech or you do.