Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Even if the inspector determines that VAT needs to be charged on these services, shouldn't it be Dmitry who is paying them, not the foundation?

From the look of it, Dmitry is outside the EU, making the foundation the importer and thus responsible for the VAT.




I never heard of this. Is that actually a rule in the Netherlands? I don't think/hope it is in the UK at least.


This is a rule everywhere, in every nation with any serious tax system - otherwise it is a big loop hole for everyone and no taxes at all would be collected.

Example: a dutch company sells a product to dutch consumers. They have to pay VAT. However what if they setup a company in another country that first buys the products for 0.001 cents and then sells the products back for full price to the consumer.

Most, if not all, countries do not apply VAT on exports.

In the end it doesnt matter where it was produced. Its taxed based on where it was consumed.

When an economic union such as the EU refer to an internal market they mean stuff like this. But as a result all VAT in the EU are now almost identical (or else your own producers would be tempted to move the profit to another EU country)


Cross-border VAT is the foundation of something called carousel fraud.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_trader_fraud

The EU changed its cross-border VAT rules a couple of years ago, and they're now insanely complicated and probably unenforceable.

But unfortunately if a company/charity is domiciled in the EU then EU laws apply, even if the person with a controlling interest is domiciled elsewhere.


> a dutch company sells a product to dutch consumers. They have to pay VAT.

Just a clarification: the consumer pays the tax. The company collects the tax and transfers it to the state (deducting the taxes they paid in their activity, so what they actually give to the taxman is a "value added" tax).


The EU VAT system was overhauled very recently (VAT rate of buyer, not seller) exactly because many businesses were "moving" to low VAT countries like Luxembourg.


So dumb.


Dumb from whom?

It makes a lot of sense, unfortunately it's more of a hassle which hurts small businesses relatively more.


This is EU wide so it would apply to the UK, for now.

Note that the rules for intra-EU B2B transfers may be different (deferred VAT).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: