The problem with your understanding is two-fold: first, "one CPU, one vote" sounds very egalitarian, but in practice it just means people buy vote share and therefore control.
The second is the idea that democracy is a perfect consensus system. That's only true if nobody agrees to fork.
No social contract is written in stone (despite millennia of efforts to do so).
"He who has the chips, makes the rules."
The problem with your understanding is two-fold: first, "one CPU, one vote" sounds very egalitarian, but in practice it just means people buy vote share and therefore control.
The second is the idea that democracy is a perfect consensus system. That's only true if nobody agrees to fork.
No social contract is written in stone (despite millennia of efforts to do so).