Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The good ol' "I don't want to be accused of a crime, so I'll preemptively commit a crime" defense.

I would strongly advise against discriminating against people based on their sex in the course of your business dealings.



You are placing normative (meaning "you should do") moral judgements on a descriptive (meaning "this will happen") moral statement.

My prediction isn't what SHOULD happen, but what I think WILL happen. My personal opinion on what is morally right? As I'm not a VC, utterly unimportant and redundant.


Apologies. Consider my ire directed at the people you describe, not at yourself.


Is sexual discrimination in business actually a crime in the US? I thought it was typically handled in civil court.


I think you're right. It's "unlawful" but handled civilly.

While looking up the relevant law, I looked through the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex and various other things, and discovered that there is an explicit exception written in to the law for members of the Communist Party. So you can totally discriminate against any commies who might try to work for you. Not really relevant here, but so weird I just had to share.


Jeez, the Cold War was a strange time. The exception seems especially weird since political party affiliation wasn't a protected class in the law to begin with. I guess that meant you legally could say, "We only hire non-Communists, regardless of sex/race/religion/...; and white Communist Jain men of Estonian origin."

I wonder if it was just a "safeguard" against members of CPUSA claiming their membership was a religious affiliation.


I found this PDF which describes some of the history behind this clause:

http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=...

It sounds like it was an amendment introduced by a confused lawmaker who wanted to make sure the law wouldn't stop companies from firing Communists. The amendment was then accepted on the basis that it didn't make any difference (since as you note party affiliation isn't protected in the first place), so it wouldn't do any harm to include it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: