Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

x1.16xlarge is 64 threads (174.5 ECU), 1 TB RAM, 2 TB SSD, for $6.669 per Hour.

x1.32xlarge is double in every respect.

i3.16xlarge is 64 threads (200 ECU), 488 GB RAM, 15 TB SSD, $4.992 per hour.

Seems competitive.



It's competitive if you don't actually need the 28.8TB NVMe SSD. If you actually need that much storage capacity and speed you are looking at provisioning 2 i3.16xlarge's and hoping your application can be distributed across multiple instances.


Sure, and if you need 1 or 2 TB of RAM, Oracle won't be able to help, and that's a much harder parameter to work around...

Anyway, my point was that it didn't, IMHO, "easily mop the floor with AWS on price/performance ratio".


On RAM, yes. On random IOPS and throughput to the 28.8TB NVMe storage - no comparison.


Do you have some numbers? According to here [1] an i3.16xlarge will get you "up to to 3.3 million random IOPS at a 4 KB block size and up to 16 GB/second of disk throughput. "

What does Oracle claim? I see here they say 1 million IOPS.[2]

[1] https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/ec2-instance-type-update-t2...

[2] http://www.biwasummit.org/biwa/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/84...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: