Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I think the basic idea - questioning people about things they ought to know, given who they claim to be - is a good one.

It's an awful idea. False negatives. Discriminates against people with harder professions. Wouldn't keep out determined people



As to the last part, if people are sufficiently determined, you're in for a hard time, anyway. A 30-second screening at the border is pretty good at sorting out the Epsilon minus semi-morons, though. (Whose numbers, one would suspect, vastly outdoes the really determined ones.)

As for false negatives, I wouldn't be too concerned as long as you got to talk to someone reasonably well versed in your field. Also, as suggested by golergka and rconti - they probably use the questions as a way to elicit a response from you and judge that, more than your actual answers. That makes a lot of sense to me, now that I pause to think of it for a second.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: