Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The discrepancy with the number in the article is that you're including 2^23 mantissae with exponent 0. In any case, the interesting bit is that half of floats are in the interval [-1, 1].


> the interesting bit is that half of floats are in the interval [-1, 1]

This is not so surprising once you realize that this just means you have the same precision for 1/x as for x, which makes a lot of sense for scientific calculations.


I'll clarify mostly for my sake (I hadn't thought about this before)

f(x) = 1/x takes takes numbers in the range (-1, 1) to numbers outside that range, and vice versa. The representable floats are split evenly between those two sets


Yes, that was exactly my line of thinking.

One minor nitpick: f(x)=1/x maps [-1,1] to [-inf,-1]u[+1,+inf] ... that is, 1 and -1 are in both sets and mapped onto themselves. However, this detail doesn't affect the argument much.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: