Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

  why FSF isn't stepping up and resolving this issue once and for good?
Because they don't have standing. They're not a judiciary, so they can't establish precedent - it take a court to do that.

Sure, they could change the wording, but unless there's a court verdict to establish precedent, there will always be ambiguity.



They can say what they intended to mean, and while that won't become a part of the license, a court may consider that. Especially if this would get widespread as "not tested but meant as a canon interpretation" common knowledge.

To put it in other words, clarifying won't hurt, even if it could have no real effect.

But, yeah, the real way to fix is AGPLv4. And FSF surely can do this.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: