Could you clarify your objection? Presumably clients would never immutably cache... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		twoodfin on Jan 26, 2017 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Using Immutable Caching to Speed Up the Web Could you clarify your objection? Presumably clients would never immutably cache a resource they couldn't validate.

jjoe on Jan 26, 2017 [–]

How does validation work in the case of a 200 status and no Content-Length header?

scrollaway on Jan 26, 2017 | [–]

I'd also like to know. I hope subresource integrity can be implemented alongside the cache control and prevent caching a bad file.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subres...

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact