Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Are you only asking the person you replied to? I have some topics I think indicate shortcomings in the language itself, but when I've brought these to the attention of core Rust developers in other threads of discussion the result hasn't been fruitful.


Which topics, and which threads of discussion?


I've had several discussions with you over the last couple years. I create throw away accounts on Hacker News, Stack Exchange, Reddit, Slashdot, Rust Users, and so on because I value my privacy. I don't want to tie my throw away accounts together, so I won't include links.

My experiences discussing anything Rust related with you has generally gone like this: I list several things I think are problems. You refute a small nit in only one of them and neglect the rest of the message. Giving the impression that you've successfully refuted everything I've said, you tag on the stick-your-tongue-out smiley :P

I've had other discussions with other core Rust developers. As should be expected, the conversations go differently for each.


Feel free to link them to remind me of the arguments that I'm neglecting. :P


You're interested in the links, not the arguments. I can't see how this is going to be fruitful.


I'm interested in the arguments that the links contain, but I'm starting to see why I apparently never bothered to fully answer you in the first place...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: