I think you're being a bit harsh. Is there any empirical evidence that favors cl... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

andrewflnr on Dec 24, 2016 | parent | context | favorite | on: Still no violation of Lorentz symmetry, despite st...

I think you're being a bit harsh. Is there any empirical evidence that favors classic black holes over gravastars, or is our "current understanding" just a matter of what we thought of first? If the latter, take a chill pill and let us enjoy the possibilities. :)

raattgift on Dec 24, 2016 [–]

> Is there any empirical evidence that favors classic black holes over gravastars

Yes.

http://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.084... (preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.08759)

So you're still left with gravastar models that can co-exist with black holes.

Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact