> I just don't think I write code in any languages where the IDE is not great
Well, neither do we emacs-users: every language we write in has an amazingly great IDE, because emacs is our IDE for every language. And, other than go-mode's wanton breakage of M-., there aren't generally gratuitous inconsistencies when switching between languages.
I don't really think of emacs as being a solution in resource-constrained environments (although it works well there too): it's excellent on its own, not just a way to eke out constrained resources a bit further.
Well, neither do we emacs-users: every language we write in has an amazingly great IDE, because emacs is our IDE for every language. And, other than go-mode's wanton breakage of M-., there aren't generally gratuitous inconsistencies when switching between languages.
I don't really think of emacs as being a solution in resource-constrained environments (although it works well there too): it's excellent on its own, not just a way to eke out constrained resources a bit further.