Allegedly (according to HP labs anyway) my 15 year old software[0] was state-of-the-art at this on the CNN dataset[1].
By my thing was very heuristic based, and couldn't generate new sentences like this can. I'm pretty impressed - I'd say some of the machine generated summaries are better than the human ones.
By my thing was very heuristic based, and couldn't generate new sentences like this can. I'm pretty impressed - I'd say some of the machine generated summaries are better than the human ones.
[0] http://classifier4j.sourceforge.net/ (yes, Sourceforge! Shows how old it is!!)
[1] http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2797081