Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Before Napster, to hear whatever you wanted, whenever you wanted, you had to pay for it.

What?? Before Napster, we made tapes. I still have tons of them. We exchanged tapes and copied them, and also we recorded the radio.

It was exactly like Napster, only much slower and complicated -- and also, in a way, nicer, because putting a tape together was a form of expression.

I don't think free streaming can go away without being immediately replaced by increased piracy, but we'll see.



>Before Napster, we made tapes.

Sure, but it took a lot longer and required a great deal more effort--though significantly less so once CDs came on the scene. Also, if just about everyone I knew at the time is any indication, we also bought quite a few albums.

I don't disagree with your basic point but Napster did change the equation. (I also tend to agree about what will happen if free streaming goes away--although the other dynamic in play is the many people who now expect instant access to a huge music catalog rather than owning MP3s. For them, having to go back to assembling a music catalog would be a big step backward even if they could do so for "free.")


No, see, home-taping was illegal and in the physical world you can't break the law as easily as in the lawless wasteland that is the internet.


Home taping on analog media was not illegal. [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_Home_Recording_Act


home taping killed music and it was illegal[0]

[0]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Taping_Is_Killing_Music


Media campaign vs actual law.


More specifically, differing law in different countries.


fair point, my original response was indeed US-centric.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: