> Someone else in the world reported the problem back in September, and aside from some random person asking a totally useless question, nothing had happened on the thread.
It's a special kind of horror to find, after hours of high-end-googling, the one thread where someone reports the same problem you are experiencing, and it's just the question, and then one other person asking if the problem has been solved because she/he is having the same problem.
The one thing that is worse is if the OP then makes another post that simply says "Solved it! =D", without giving any explanation on how they solved it.
Or when you find a thread where someome is asking the question and the only response is by some wise guy telling him to "search". And of course, searching keeps pointing you back to the same thread.
On the plus side, the last time this happened to me, I discovered that someone had posted a really useful answer to my question which helped solve me problem.
The person who had posted the answer was, of course, also me.
My experience is that said person coming back to my thread is a coworker. Then they tell me they can't get away from me and even after they try to find something on their own I helped them fix it. Quite amusing
At least half of every enterprise software I have used suffers from catastrophic link rot. And when you look at the URLs that do still map or redirect to something marginally on-topic, you just know it's a single API change away from redirecting to "we don't know what you're looking for, try searching here for hundreds of completely off topic (and occasionally broken) links".
No, I am not bitter. Learning where their FTP server is and how to navigate, well, that was gold.
Hmm, there must be some extension that detects 404 errors and/or server unresponsive and prompts whether you want to check Google's cache or the Internet archive. That browsers haven't already integrated this (with a configurable list of archiving services, like search engines), is actually rather surprising to me.
There are many such extensions, but yes, we're working on getting directly integrated into Firefox, Chrome, Edge, and if anyone has a contact at Safari (or one of the other browsers), my email addr is in my profile. Thanks.
Yes, but it is only temporary. As long as you have a robots.txt file excluding some URLs, those URLs will: 1) not be crawled by the Internet Archive crawler, 2) not be shown in the Wayback Machine. Any already-crawled pages will, however, invisibly remain in the archive, and will reappear once they are not in the robots.txt anymore.
Mmmh, that has never happened to me. That is just plain mean.
Now that I think of it, I have seen that happen, but the reply was inevitably "I have already googled the question to death, without finding any useful results."
Someone should reply "tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 100ms" in the original thread [ https://communities.vmware.com/thread/519888 ] and link to the blog post. Ideally that person would know enough about tc to suggest how to do it only for outbound tcp6 handshakes too.
The worst is when somebody reports "solved it", then you spend four hours figuring out why it didn't work only to learn the kernel changed behavior (this happened to me recently) and the problem can't be fixed.
It's a special kind of horror to find, after hours of high-end-googling, the one thread where someone reports the same problem you are experiencing, and it's just the question, and then one other person asking if the problem has been solved because she/he is having the same problem.
The one thing that is worse is if the OP then makes another post that simply says "Solved it! =D", without giving any explanation on how they solved it.