Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's far more than web-based IRC and has a substantial userbase, a significant number of whom are paying for the service. Given the failures MS has had with communication tools in the past, I'm not surprised at all they mulled an $8B acquisition of Slack



> It's far more than web-based IRC

How exactly?


Inline animated gif support.


Mobile clients, persistent chat history when switching clients/devices, search, @mentions notify you when you're away from your desk, and easy integrations with lots of services.

P.S. I mainly use IRC everyday :)


"persistent" up to 10,000 messages per team.


Forever if you pay for it.

i.e. they have a revenue stream.


Which is IRC + ZNC + Andchat + bots...


This echoes the "couldn't you just replicate Dropbox with x + y + z ..." mindset of the past.


Why the past?

I tried to use Dropbox but it just didn't have what I wanted it to have. So, I find it to be not only replaceable, but awfully inferior to the x+y+z-style solutions.


Which takes time to set up, whereas it's already done for you in Slack.


Of course it does. But you get to keep your data for yourself.


Revenue




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: