Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>but build it in ten years.

A hundred years, actually. I made the same mistake reading the article and had to do a double take.



Ah, indeed. Fair point.

I think my argument still stands, though--even a hundred years for something of this scale is beyond any science we can reasonably hypothesize about. Doesn't mean we can't speculate, just that it's not terribly constructive speculation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: