Civil cases are, by definition, not dealing with crimes. They're typically dealing with contractual obligations, or agreements of mutual and fair performance by two parties. If one was a good husband/wife in every respect, and occasionally got their libido raised by flirting with someone online, are they a bad person?
Or, as the saying goes, "it doesn't matter where you get your appetite as long as you eat at home." If the racy conversations are a result of unhappiness in a relationship, it's a symptom and not a cause. If it were medicine, we'd aim to treat the cause in order to mitigate the symptoms, not punish the symptoms by making the patient parade them for the world to see.
Not at all. Because your premise, based on there being a "case", is flawed. In many jurisdictions, infidelity doesn't matter in divorce. And in criminal matters, at least here in the US, there's that pesky fifth amendment right to contend with.
>In many jurisdictions, infidelity doesn't matter in divorce
In witch judiriction infidelity is no motive for divorce, I don't know any, and if that is the case? what about those judirictions where it is? why is a bad thing using decryption there?
Or, as the saying goes, "it doesn't matter where you get your appetite as long as you eat at home." If the racy conversations are a result of unhappiness in a relationship, it's a symptom and not a cause. If it were medicine, we'd aim to treat the cause in order to mitigate the symptoms, not punish the symptoms by making the patient parade them for the world to see.