> Advocacy organizations are not journalists. They don't need to cite their sourcing before making claims they believe are true. The purpose of calling out Facebook is an attempt force them to align their public and private positions if they differ.
So in other words, as long as they are "advocacy organizations" and say that they believe in some view, they get a free pass to lie, spread bullshit and FUD? I thought we should have a higher standard.
Personally, I am for severely punishing liars as a top priority, no matter what side they're on. Then we may get a constructive discussion.
So in other words, as long as they are "advocacy organizations" and say that they believe in some view, they get a free pass to lie, spread bullshit and FUD? I thought we should have a higher standard.
Personally, I am for severely punishing liars as a top priority, no matter what side they're on. Then we may get a constructive discussion.