| | Competing in a data science contest without reading the data (2015) (mrtz.org) |
| 1 point by zebreus on May 3, 2024 | past |
|
| | The NIPS experiment (mrtz.org) |
| 1 point by nafizh on Oct 18, 2018 | past |
|
| | Fairness in Machine Learning [slides] (mrtz.org) |
| 2 points by stablemap on Dec 5, 2017 | past |
|
| | The zen of gradient descent (mrtz.org) |
| 43 points by peterkshultz on Oct 9, 2016 | past | 4 comments |
|
| | Competing in a data science contest without reading the data (mrtz.org) |
| 2 points by fforflo on Oct 2, 2016 | past |
|
| | Approaching fairness in machine learning (mrtz.org) |
| 65 points by optimali on Sept 7, 2016 | past | 50 comments |
|
| | Competing in a data science contest without reading the data (mrtz.org) |
| 2 points by sonabinu on Sept 5, 2016 | past |
|
| | Is Differential Privacy Practical (2013) (mrtz.org) |
| 6 points by valine on June 14, 2016 | past |
|
| | The Zen of Gradient Descent (mrtz.org) |
| 2 points by sonabinu on May 11, 2016 | past |
|
| | Competing in a data science contest without reading the data (mrtz.org) |
| 37 points by urish on April 17, 2015 | past | 4 comments |
|
| | Towards practicing differential privacy (mrtz.org) |
| 8 points by Cynddl on March 14, 2015 | past |
|
| | Towards practicing differential privacy (mrtz.org) |
| 7 points by Cynddl on March 14, 2015 | past | 2 comments |
|
| | Is Differential Privacy practical? (2013) (mrtz.org) |
| 29 points by luu on March 11, 2015 | past | 4 comments |
|
| | How to break a machine learning competition (mrtz.org) |
| 2 points by noisydonut on March 9, 2015 | past |
|
| | Half the papers at NIPS would be rejected if the review process were rerun (mrtz.org) |
| 141 points by urish on Dec 15, 2014 | past | 49 comments |
|
| | Robustness versus Acceleration in gradient descent (mrtz.org) |
| 11 points by j2kun on Aug 20, 2014 | past |
|
| | The Zen of Gradient Descent (mrtz.org) |
| 100 points by ot on Aug 15, 2014 | past | 11 comments |
|
