He said why, he wanted to open source it with the mentioned exception.

I think there are also licenses that do that, and revert to full MIT after some time, but the author decided to roll their own.

What’s the problem with that? He can license it however he wants and the reason he mentions is perfectly valid tbh

Legal writing is like code: it's a specific domain, that requires special expertise to write properly.

If you see a problem with a non-programmer writing code, then you should see a problem with a non-lawyer writing licenses.

Do you see a problem with a non-programmer writing code?

Depends on the language no? Works in German

it's wild to me that Americand accept a private company plastering their town with surveillance cameras, given you know, everything

Additionally, that you draw the line at sharing that juicy data with law enforcement. I mean sure, yeah, but even before that, sharing essentially all your movement data with some company because...?

We don't accept that? Our civil liberties have been infringed upon by neoliberals and oligarchs for the last 100+ years, starting with Lincoln with income tax and FDR with social security into the mess we have today.

I got 16.000 tokens per second ahaha

The average non cyclical component of longterm unemployment has been rising steadily since the 50s tho

The level seems to be increasing, clearly, despite the cyclical components

I shall give the benefit of a doubt given they are "building in the open". I feel my current setup already does all this though, so I struggle to see the point

It’s funny. The whole “review intent", "learning" from past mistakes, etc, is exactly what my current set up does too. For free. Using .md files said agents generate as they go.

In the past it seemed there was routing based on context-length. So the model was always the same, but optimized for different lengths. Is this still the case?

The reality is that Copilot’s laughable performance is almost entirely unrelated to AI models not being good at X.

Every single thing Copilot does has been solved much better by other products.

However, Copilot fails in extremely ridiculous ways, at very basic tasks which such a product absolutely must nail.

Copilot should not have been released. A large majority of people involved have failed. People like managers, product managers etc should probably be fired. Technical leads equally so.

For everyone who has been building similar products it is immediately obvious that Copilot is sloppy, unfocused and unprofessionally executed.

People hate it, and for hood reason.

It just boggles the mind how they would go and release it, or that it even exists in its current form.

Those devs and managers rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars each, producing garbage that has been done better by dozens or hundreds of other teams

Bah

Apple is terrible. I have to install xcode for whatever reason but do not want to use it.

Yet every week it assigns itself as default program for all sorts of files, from markdown to python modules.

So clicking on pretty much anything opens this.

Apple is just very bad at user interface. Whoever said Mac as better than Linux or even Windows is insane.

I hate it.

You csv override the default app for any file type using Get Info or other this party tools https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/choose-an-app-to-op...