Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | yieldcrv's commentslogin

As a betting man… this is not survivable

Just after takeoff is the worst time to have a problem. Hopefully they had the minimum crew. Also hopefully it wasn't carrying a nuke and/or it wasn't compromised.

They have maximum crew possible which is 8. All confirmed dead.

[flagged]


Kindly request that you keep your requests he keep his guesses to himself to yourself.

now imagine if you were like the rest of us and didn’t write a blog post about it

I would not have found out about this. Thanks for the writer for taking the time.

Been going on for over half a decade

I think we need a different kind of PSA if its still so new to people


> It gets into loops quite often

matches my experience and a deal breaker

also the context window sizes are too low. I can't operate in 65,000 windows any more because even just reading the code's file structure overruns it and gets me nowhere. Definitely its own art form.

200k context windows and above for me now

I saw a paper last night that should help this a lot though


I get that it's a deal breaker to some; it definitely requires patience.

In Pi, /new is my best friend and most-used command for sure. For simple tasks (I decompose complex ones anyway since I don't trust small local LLMs to do this for me), the model doesn't need much context, given that I'm proficient in my codebase myself: "I'd like Feature X. Look into files 1, 2 and 3 to make your edits."


Qwen3.6-35b handles 256k context fine if you’ve got room for it. I’m running it with 128k context with just 16gb vram.

so cheap FDE's for the non profit sector

alright


Palantir had first mover advantage on FDE rebranding of sales engineer, and so its the term that stuck

I’d rather read a headline than read the site

(It won’t load)


> I guess nobody ever got fired for paying KPMG and friends for an expensive report that supported their priors.

I mean basically. KMPG is a regulatory checkmark in some industries


yes, there are

no, most won’t burn themselves by publicly linking them as vibe coded

there is that ny times article about the peptide guy and lovable showcase by revenue though. I guess next up are even more disqualifiers about the term “successful”, but my outstanding question is who cares? What does convincing you buy, an Anthropic pro subscription at best?


don't ask how the sausage is made

last time I waded into this discussion with my own examples, the "billionaires exploit people" maximalists kept moving the goal post indefinitely

I had asked "what about a fund manager earning the carry"

management fee and performance fee, employees not entirely necessary.

the main result was a brief back and forth to understand that role, because this class of people are completely separated from all the exceptions that break their argument, and then a brief moment of acceptance, before focusing on the prevalence of this kind of billionaire amongst all billionaires. Which I thought was funny because there are not many billionaires to begin with. 20 fund managers on the list would be a large percentage of billionaires.


Didn’t the last thread about this have someone from the lab or an enthusiast in Rio saying exactly that?

Its a fine tune of Qwen

Not a conspiracy


The allegation here is that it's not actually a fine-tune of Qwen, but instead an undisclosed mashup (merge) of someone else's fine-tune of Qwen and the original model. Rio subsequently said that the model was in fact a merge, that they did additional fine-tuning after the merge, and that they accidentally uploaded the base merge instead of the version with additional fine-tuning. But this seems like quite an oversight...

> But this seems like quite an oversight...

Not to me, what would people like to happen? Who are those people? And why do they care?


They made a public claim to having produced a useful model, which they published. Turns out they did nothing of the sort.

> why do they care?

Why does anyone ever care about having their time wasted by fraudulent claims?


Continue to explain like I’m 5 instead of the rhetoricals

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: