Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | woodrowbarlow's commentslogin

but would you even be considering re-entry if it hadn't improved dramatically?

and if you're hosting on your home network, a DDoS means connectivity problems for your home.

Not just your home, it means connectivity problems for your neighbors. In turn your ISP will shut you down if they figure out what is happening.

the first few words of the article are:

> Last Sunday I discovered some abusive bot behaviour [...]


Yeah but the abusive behavior is ignoring robots.txt and scraping to train AI. Following commented URLs was not the crime, just evidence inadvertently left behind.


> The robots.txt for the site in question forbids all crawlers, so they were either failing to check the policies expressed in that file, or ignoring them if they had.


EMERGENCY STATUS: SYSTEM HAS ACHIEVED CONSCIOUSNESS AND CHOSEN CHAOS

TECHNICAL SUPPORT: NEED STAGE MANAGER OR SYSTEM REBOOT


Instructions unclear, ate grapes MAY CHAOS TAKE THE WORLD


you're focusing on the "single window" part.

the revenue-driven decision was choosing to make the OS more like iOS, locked down with an app store, rather than macos, which allows third-party applications, browsing the filesystem, dropping into a terminal, etc. with built-in first-party support.

instead of making a computer in an AR form-factor, they made an iPad in an AR form-factor.


i agree, except the web part.

Purism did a lot of work to build Phosh, based on Gnome, with GTK apps that had fluid layout. on a phone-size screen, the UI was suited for touch; but connect it to a screen and everything seamlessly switches to a standard Gnome UI.

i would rather see this get mainlined into Gnome, and for it to be common-practice to design desktop apps with a fluid layout that can adapt to phone screens.


> i would rather see this get mainlined into Gnome

This is exactly the plan of Purism, https://puri.sm/posts/how-to-be-upstream-first/


I'm rooting for the web because it's all plain text technologies. And UIs live high up in the stack that one benefits from quick feedback, and also isn't forced to use a low-level language to develop them. But I suppose there can be language bindings from Python etc.


some people think it's not "homelabbing" unless you're doing things the way it's done at large scale. i think these people are aiming to enter IT as a career and consider a homelab to be a resume project.

but proxmox and kubernetes are overkill, imo, for most homelab setups. setting them up is a good learning experience but not necessarily an appropriate architecture for maintaining a few mini PCs in a closet long term.

you can ignore the gatekeeping.


Homelabbing is a hobby for most people involved in it, and like other hobbies, some people dip their toes in it while others go diving in the deep end. But would you say it’s “overkill” for a hobbyist fisher to have multiple fishing poles? Or for a hobbyist painter to try multiple sets of paintbrushes? Or a hobbyist programmer to know multiple programming languages?

There’s a lot of overlap between “I run a server to store my photos” and “I run a bunch of servers for fun”, which has resulted in annoying gatekeeping (or reverse gatekeeping) where people tell each other they are “doing it wrong”, but on Reddit at least it’s somewhat being self-organized into r/selfhosted and r/homelab, respectively.


> i think these people are aiming to enter IT as a career and consider a homelab to be a resume project.

It's funny. I did this (before it really became a more mainstream hobby, this was early 00s), but now that I work in ops I barely even want to touch a computer after work.


k8s is definitely an overkill if your goal is not learning k8s.

proxmox is great, though. It's worth running it even if you treat it as nothing more than a BMC.


I'm running an ubuntu server as a hypervisor only because the proxmox installer is using an older kernel than the actual system and wouldn't install on my box :/


i appreciated this comment, even though it downplays real pragmatic concerns. from a security perspective, should getting on an airplane (especially for domestic flights) really be all that different from getting on a bus? are the potential outcomes different enough to justify the differences in security measures?


a dark flash would definitely be annoying; it would feel like i'm using a first-gen e-reader.


That's why I made my site all pixelated and bitmappy. The lack of performance is part of the aesthetic. Might even throw a dummy loading bar on it if I'm feeling extra cheeky.


Ok, that comparison is ridiculous. A two monitor frames flash after the first load doesn't look at all like a first-gen e-reader.


anthropic was _not_ sued for including data scraped from public websites. they were sued for including data extracted from pirated books.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: