Are you suggesting that hn is removing comment's/post's that don't look down on the poor or fetishize wealth? I'm not sure how hn being vc backed has any influence on how I or anyone else here comments
It sounds like parent comment is suggesting that hn attracts a demographic of people who look down on the poor and fetishize wealth, not that it's suppressing posts or trying to influence comments.
Because the former is a reduction in real terms. The latter is an increase in real terms. The increase from $2.15 2017 dollars to $3.00 2021 dollars is well above the inflation in that time frame. The article points this out quite explicitly:
> However, the IPL has also increased substantially, even after inflation adjustments. The poverty line has increased in real terms.
Then they should pay them, in Germany a non-compete has to be compensated. A country might not want brain drain at all, is it then acceptable to stop people from leaving?
Maybe more likely that they just assume they are caught, or assume the likelihood of getting caught is higher when there is overt screening for North Koreans.
Similar to why email scammers don’t need good grammar, filtering out difficult cases quickly and move on to easier ones.
>They are more concerned with social progressivism than the liberal foundations of our democracy
That's absolutely not true
In 2017 they filed a lawsuit defending conservative / far-right Milo Yiannopoulos [1] and spoke up for suppression of Trump [2]. Defended someone wishing death to gay people [3]. Filed an amicus brief supporting the NRA's free speech in '18 [4]
There's a lot more where that came from but I don't need to lie by citation. The reality, as the electorate saw it, was that most liberal organizations in the 2020's suffered from mission creep. Planned Parenthood went on record supporting defunding the police, the Sierra Club redefined environmentalism as antiracism(?) etc
There is not a single AI model that fully complies with GDPR. How can you inform everyone, even those not named by actual name but otherwise identifiable, that their data is being processed and give them the ability to object when the data they train on isn’t public.
Literally the same for all other open weights, this is just legal ass covering where most others don’t even do that.
> People really need to resist the urge to anthropomorphize corporations.
I understand where you are coming from, but this also sounds like a way to remove individual responsibility from the people that make up a corporation.
https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/january-2017-cyber-n...
reply