Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | unlimited_power's commentslogin


I'll plug BitShares DNS--a Namecoin competitor I am working on--here: http://nmushegian.github.io/dns/

Whitepaper and FAQ are not quite up to date but you get the idea. From: https://github.com/nmushegian/dns/blob/master/whitepaper.md#...

- Namecoin issues new coins to miners as a reward for performing merged mining with the Bitcoin network. The namecoin supply is being inflated at nearly 30% per year for several more months, then over 10% for the next several years. Domainshares only ever shrink in supply, when fees are destroyed as implicit dividends.

- Namecoin attempts to service multiple namespaces at once. .p2p is highly specialized for servicing the .p2p TLD namespace. The use case is the same as Namecoin's "d/" namespace, which is used for the .bit TLD.

- Namecoin's name registration price is fixed at any given time and is independent of the name itself. Domainshares utilizes an auction-like mechanic to incentivize price discovery for names, making sure the final owner pays what it is actually worth. The majority of the final cost will have gone to the network as dividends by the time the auction is over, with a small fraction having gone to bidders as a reward for price discovery.

- As a result of the fact that domains are expensive and there are dividends on shares but not domains, there is a high opportunity cost to squatting: holding a domain without making good use of it.


  Domainshares utilizes an auction-like mechanic to 
  incentivize price discovery for names, making sure 
  the final owner pays what it is actually worth.
How would this work for, say, google.com ?


We are still working on the exact mechanics (open to suggestions!), but the simple first model is:

- The price starts at 0 and people bid it up to the market value

- If someone makes a bid B1, then someone makes a next bid B2 = B1 + D, then person 1 receives (B1 + D/2) and the remaining D/2 gets paid as fees to network (and thus become shareholder dividends)

- This incentivizes people to bid up the price to what they consider the market value, because of the extra portion they receive when they are outbid

- This also disincentivizes squatting because you will pay more for buying and selling the domain than you would have received as network dividends had someone else just bought the domain


So if I buy a cheap unused nonsense word domain (say wikipedia.org) and turn it into a valuable domain by making a popular website many people visit and link to, 'the network' gets to shake me down because wikipedia.org is worth $20,000,000 now instead of the $20 I paid for it?

And as an end user, I don't know if visiting or e-mailing wikipedia.org will take me to an encyclopedia or a cybersquatter or a porn site?

Who exactly benefits from this system, except for 'the network'?


Not sure what you mean exactly but it works like that : Once you buy your domain at 20$ is is yours and you do whatever you want with it. The bidding auction applies only the first time you buy it nobody can touch your domain name one you purchased it.



I like it


I believe they stopped doing multi-user deduplication a while ago.



Y'know, something more than a naked link is going to be just a smidge more useful and informative:

AreWePrivateYet recreates Stanford University's Tracking the Trackers: Self-Help Tools study on a continuous basis in a reproducible way. The above chart compares the level of protection provided by the different privacy extensions across various metrics.


It is also worth mentioning that http://www.areweprivateyet.com/ is created and maintained by Evidon, the makers of Ghostery (and unfortunately, they have no placed any obvious disclaimer except the footer mention and the top right ghostery logo which is not entirely sufficient imo


Use a service like BitPay and it converts instantly.


That's just transferring the expense/risk which is not sustainable.


All payment processors take currency risk. Coinbase has an interesting approach by also being an exchange and doing some algorithmic arbitrage.

The current volatility isn't inherent to the protocol, it's just a function of market depth and liquidity which will presumably improve/stabilize as the network grows.


But not all currencies have the same risk.


Exchanging into dollars is momentary, it's dollar withdrawal that takes days. So, actually the only risk that's being taken by bitpay is the fifteen minutes between the moment the price is displayed and someone pays (after 15 minutes the proce they lost in btc becomes invalid)

And even against that risk they can hedge. So it can really be sustaining.


my back button!?


I encourage people to look at the paper Transactions as Proof-of-Stake & The End of Mining[0] defining a form of the idea. BitShares[1] (due out in Q2 2014) will implement this.

[0] https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1138.0

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BV55IrZi7g



There is also Adblock Edge which is a fork of Adblock Plus without the "acceptable ads" feature:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/


There are alternative full-node implementations. A couple examples:

https://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/btcd

https://darkwallet.unsystem.net/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: