Are the Apple-owned app windows inconsistent too? I see some inconsistencies but it's generally 3rd party apps mixed with Apple's apps.

> Are the Apple-owned app windows inconsistent too? I see some inconsistencies but it's generally 3rd party apps mixed with Apple's apps.

Does it matter if it's 3rd party apps or not? Wasn't a huge part of the sell with Apple's own GUI toolkits that all native apps work uniquely, but look familiar and like part of one and the same? The consistency and "all apps look and work great" I seem to recall being one of the "features" people used to tout about OSX.

FWIW; TFA compares the border radius of TextEdit and Calculator, both two Apple apps, built-in nonetheless.

Yes. The article only shows Apple-owned apps: TextEdit and Calculator. And it shows the various border radiuses for different elements straight from XCode's UI builder.

Yes, for example Safari and Terminal have different radiuses. Most of the 1st party apps seem to be the same as Safari, so I guess Terminal didn't fully get "glassed".

I don’t know if they fixed it, but at release the Automator traffic lights appeared outside the corner radius.

Edit: it is fixed and they polished up the UI since then.

Yes, I noticed this shortly after the update. I forget the specifics, but Apple first party apps definitely have this issue.

Some do, yes.

Dario said in an interview with CBS that they're not against fully autonomous weapons but their technology is there yet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPTNHrq_4LU&t=17m47s

Not sure how that's relevant. I never said Dario was taking an ethical stand. I said they did not agree for Claude to be used for fully autonomous weapons. Now, compare that to OpenAI, whose agreement does allow fully autonomous weapons.

I cancelled and deleted my account and I got an email immediately with a pro-rata refund. You can get that money back.

There's no way you're reviewing 20kloc a day unless all you're doing is the Sandi Metz squint test.

I think the O means order of magnitude. It looks like Big O notation, but O(10) would collapse to O(1) and OP is not talking about efficiency anyway.

If it was a joke (the test suite issue), then it was a really shit joke. It reads more like backtracking, I don't think _you_ should feel any embarrassment.

The gag started on Twitter after Cloudflare vibe coded a nextjs replacement clone.

If you know that context and the tweet I feel this is more obvious that it is a joke.

Just because you didn't get the joke, does not make it a really shit joke. The funniest jokes rely on context.

I also had unsolicited spam from Vincent Jiang of Aden, another YC company.

    Hi Daniel,

    I just came across your profile on social media and wondered if you'd be interested in joining our Discord community for AI agent development. Currently, we see that agents break, loop, get lost, hallucinate, and cost a fortune, and therefore built a space where developers can share challenges and insights.

…and more from Backdrop.

    Hi Daniel, I found your GitHub profile while searching for anthropic projects, and got your email from your profile.

    I'm part of an online program for builders called Backdrop Build, and I think that program would be a great fit given what you are building. We have a track for builders in AI like you, it's fully online/remote and costs nothing to participate. It also works if you have a day job, it's light on time and perfect for side projects!

And then another after I marked the first one as spam and ignored it.

    Checking in one last time to see if you have any questions about the program or the application. If it's not for you, all good - just ignore the email because I won't be pinging you again :)

   Joey from Backdrop

Both companies have guaranteed that I won't use their services nor procure them for any organisation I work for.

Hey it's Joey checking in again. We noticed you mentioned our company, let me know if you have any questions about our (free!) program. I'll go ahead and email you some more info, just in case.

I had a similar one from that guy asking me to make open source PRs to some repo of theirs for, err, $25-50/hour. I replied explaining that senior software engineers in the UK aren’t quite as desperately poor as that, and got a canned response saying that they were looking forward to reviewing my PRs :D

Blows my mind that you guys are so expensive lol.

SWE salaries in the UK are fairly unsurprising as they tend to be more or less in the range of other professional salaries. If they’re high from a worldwide point of view that’s just because most of us are in London and London is a high cost of living city.

Hi git,

I just came across your profile on social media and wondered if you'd be interested in joining our Discord community for AI agent development. Currently, we see that agents break, loop, get lost, hallucinate, and cost a fortune, and therefore built a space where developers can share challenges and insights.

So far, more than 8,000 members are sharing technical insights, agent templates, and tooling on a daily basis. We're also open-sourcing new toolings based on everyone's feedback.

Let me know if you are interested in joining; you can find the Discord link invite on our site (Adenhq).

Best, Bryan Zhang

--

Hive - Framework for autonomous, adaptive agent Bryan Zhang Co-founder and CTO If you're not interested, please feel free to ignore this message; no further contact will be made.

Computer programming is cheap. Software engineering is expensive.

…and you can get almost identical features by simply installing the GitHub app inside Slack, and then asking Copilot to work on something, this should take < 5m to set up for any organisation using Slack and GitHub.

People with very little to no skill in software development are spending hundreds of dollars on tokens to fix things for clout, will an extra dollar barrier really slow things down noticeably?

There are a lot of _free_ models on opencode.