> I'll add more resources to find disposable domains and validation points. You can report the domain here so I can add it to the list: https://disposablecheck.irensaltali.com/report.

> As the product owner, if I didn't need real email addresses, I would just use usernames. If there is an email, then a legitimate email address is required. Spam is a different problem.

> You can report the domain here so I can add it to the list

List? You cannot determine whether an address is temporary from a domain list.

> a legitimate email address is required.

i think you need to consider by what measure disposable email addresses are not legitimate.

I built this because I kept seeing disposable emails quietly ruin signups, waitlists, and metrics — especially on small projects where every user matters. Most solutions felt heavy, paid, or overkill, so I wanted something simple, fast, and free that developers could drop in instantly.

A throw away mail is a way to anonymously test a service. Maybe you want only people that commit their real identity to evaluating your service, but maybe you will lose some conversion after an anonymous evaluation. You'll also have less word of mouth.

> Maybe you want only people that commit their real identity to evaluating your service

And nor do you get that with an ostensibly non-disposable address either. Almost anyone can sign-up a regular gmail.com address and then dispose of it.

You might be right. It's a decision that should be made by the product owners.

Agreed. Many signups go further and require a "business" address which excludes gmail.com.

And you'll have a little more bad word of mouth.

Seems like interesting work. Did you try?

Please share you comments about the course. If you didn't like it, I really love hear about better free sources.

I learned that I can use Coding intelligence with Xcode 26 and macOS Tahoe. Ref: https://developer.apple.com/xcode/whats-new/

Haha, thank you for noticing! It will be updated. I put a disclaimer on the page.

Thank you :)

Could Apple CarPlay be the OS for cars?

Do you know what this means? Most probably, they want to build a new programing language that LLMs can develop more easily with.

> squeeze max performance out of a system

Sounds more like SPIR-V and intermediary optimization for custom hardware or their current setup. I'm guessing sama wants to copy Deepseek's strategy, not build a language.

This makes the most sense given that OpenAI is moving away from Nvidia GPUs and developing their own chips for inference.

So there would need to be compiler support in Triton for their new custom inference chips that will be used run on them.

This could be more likely. I don't know why but I always think that some can build better programing language for LLMs to develop.

I don't think a greenfield programming language would be easier for AI to use or more useful than the current selection of languages.