Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | throwaway46782's commentslogin

My initial instinct to this headline was: Why would you ban that? After reading the article, I might agree this is a reasonable option.

From my perspective this type of porn was basically just porn with a bit of story attached to it, which imo elevates it slightly. Though I was mainly thinking about the step-sibling variety. From a male perspective the stepfather variety always gave me the ick, with the stepson dynamic lying somewhere in between. But I was looking at it as someone without any step-relationships in real life.

Now, after also looking up the prevalence of step-relationships lying between 10 and 40% depending on what you count, I am a lot more vary of this trend in pornography from a societal perspective. Even besides the more insidious possible effects mentioned in the article, I can see how this type of fantasy can give the (presumably majority male) porn audience wrong ideas. Like considering every woman a possible partner instead of just peer, even in the wider context of family.

In theory I agree with these kind initiatives to try and at least steer things in the right way but I also realise how often they fail. And who knows the trend following such a ban could be worse.

Ultimately, you are only treating symptoms here and ignoring the societal problems that lead to this being a thing in the first place (loneliness, fewer human connections, rise of individualism, etc.)


Apply you logic to James Bond or Call of Duty? Do they make young men believe they can go round killing each other?

I suspect the operative part here is "ick" and I get it. But why do you think homosexuality was illegal for so long? What about the trans debate? What about your own personal kink?

Your personal ick isn't a reason to stop someone doing something that doesn't harm someone else.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: