Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | thelonecabbage's commentslogin

and for PornHub's back catalog, this still take longer than the heat death of the universe


not really. 1 hour of video in 36 seconds it 1,000 hours of video / hour of computation. Assuming you go with a cluster of higher end graphics cards, you could pretty easily perform 100x better. That's 100,000 hours of video processed / hour of computation. I don't know the size of the pornhub back catalog, and I'm scared to search since I'm at work right now, but even if it's hundreds of millions of hours you could go through the whole thing in like 2 months tops.


Isn't 1 hour video in 36 seconds a 100x speedup instead of 1000? Agreed that it's definitely doable if they want.


you sir, are a genius


I'm not sure exactly why a non-fissile material with a half life this long is a "problem". By definition it's not.

Beside these are the burnup rates for Once-Through solid fuel cycles. In Uranium reactors this is only recommended if you are actively trying to create weapons material, and in Throium it simply doesn't work. Not sure what the relevance of these articles is.


"Bite me, please" 83/100


Repeat after me: Regulatory Capture


not to forget the Memoiz Module pattern from http://weblog.bocoup.com/organizing-your-backbone-js-applica...


They also wore more hats. Or the market was different, or they weren't dealing with labor shortages, or their predecessors set the stage differently, or inflation has increased 580% since 1970....

It's not possible to tease out the cause and effect.

Fortunately there is an easier way to figure it out; if the businesses are hiring idiots, at far to much money the easy way to tell they are doing it is their stock price will plummet and they will go out of business.


Or the market was different, or they...

A really significant difference that I rarely see acknowledged in these discussions is that the means of compensation has changed drastically in the last few decades.

It used to be that executives got part of their compensation through perks like generous expense accounts, or country club memberships, or keys to the executive washroom. Changes in tax laws and other cultural norms have eliminated these as such. But the corporations still need to be able to compete for the same pool of executives, and so the money that had been going into those perks now surfaces as monetary compensation.

In other words, much of the apparent increase in salaries is actually just that part of the old-days compensation wasn't reflected as income.


> or inflation has increased 580% since 1970....

It also has increased for workers, and most comparisons (including Michael's) look at the ratio between top executive comp and average worker comp.


And how would the company have performed if they hired a less expensive CEO?

Fantanomics.


For what it's worth, I've personally met with 3 European angel funds in the past 2 weeks. One of which was actually government backed corporation (that had been given explicit permission to enter Israel)


In that case wouldn't it be better to compare London to Tel-Aviv?


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: