Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | slyall's commentslogin

I assume by "no technical background" you mean he doesn't have a PHD in AI.

He's probably not developing the low-level algorithms but he can probably do everything else and has years of experience doing so.

He's also perfectly able to spend 60 hours a week improving his AI skills using the best teachers in the world.


[flagged]


I'm not sure what you mean by "he literally can't and he literally doesn't" but he's got PHD in CompSci and did everything at Google in the past from writing complex code himself to managing small teams to managing huge teams.

Exactly what do you think he can't do?

Certainly he's well qualified to manage a team of a few thousand (?) AI people and understand what they are talking about and get the best out of them.

Like Batman he has the superpower of money. If he has gaps he can pay (or otherwise arrange) for someone with those skills to 1-1 coach him in them.

He's not trying to become a top researcher, he's trying to learn enough to understand what they are talking about and be able to make decisions around say what areas should be pursued.


[flagged]


Could you please stop posting in the flamewar style? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

Edit: you've been breaking the site guidelines repeatedly and extremely badly:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46470097

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46461928

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46460655

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46426226 (Dec 2025)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46425616 (Dec 2025)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46420674 (Dec 2025)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46394806 (Dec 2025)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46293387 (Dec 2025)

This is such a high proportion of what you've been posting that I think we have to ban the account. I don't want to do that, because it's clear that you know a lot about things that people here are interested in—but the damage caused by these poisonous, aggressive comments is greater than the benefit you've been adding by sharing knowledge.

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.


The point is that 90% of the news is unimportant. Often you can read a weekly and that is enough

A politician said something and other politicians reacted. Usually unimportant unless it was backed by a law or something. If it was important then the weekly will cover it.

Main Character of the day on Social media. unimportant

A crime happened nearby. Unimportant

A celeb did something. Unimportant

Something happened to random person. Unimportant

Sport result. If you follow that team you already know, if not then not important.

Seriously go to the front page of the New York times or some other outfit and count the stories that you needed to read today.


All of this is very easy to filter out while browsing the internet. Not when you are speaking with actual persons. Believe or not, there are still people who watch television and believe in old media.

Television teaches them that the proper response to someone disagreeing is to get angry and shout when the opposing party tries to explain their point of view. Something that is useless or even technically impossible in anonymous net forums.

If you look at the old media, important decisions are mentioned but completely ignored after someone has said something offensive or an accident happened somewhere.

Social media is people and people are the problem, not technology or anonymity. Everyone who has spent Christmas with relatives knows this.


> Believe or not, there are still people who watch television and believe in old media.

Enlighten me, where do you go for proper investigative journalism that is not considered old media?


YouTube? Lots of people doing legit investigative journalism on there it's pretty impressive.


I guess I would always wonder who's paying them. YouTube doesn't pay them a salary so is it the ads or is this one side of the story paying for exposure


I think OP's point is that if your life is so blessed that "90% of the news is unimportant to you" then that itself is a great, fortunate privilege.

For example, I can tell you that if you are an immigrant in the USA from one of the (now many) targeted countries, even one with legal residency, news about ICE's actions is very relevant and very important to you.


> For example, I can tell you that if you are an immigrant in the USA from one of the (now many) targeted countries, even one with legal residency, news about ICE's actions is very relevant and very important to you.

Exactly. There's a post from last week on how media/journalism became more entertainment than information, and I think the complete opposite of the first reply: If you have bandwidth and time to consume most of those "world news", then you're the privileged.

One example: In Germany if you watch/read the state regional public broadcast from Berlin[1] for 2 days you will learn more about the whereabouts of Donald Trump, the President of Ukraine, sports news, or some broad reporting about "cultural" aspect of the city (e.g. about Hildegard Knef, something about Karl Lagerfeld and so on), or general gossip.

The city itself has fewer private investments than 5 years, the schools lack basic infrastructure, educational ratings are dropping, delays in public transportation, the hospitals are lacking personnel, 10% unemployment, and an awful housing situation, squeezing the working people.

[1] - I'm totally in favor of public broadcasting that comes from the principle called "broadcast what you want to become or aspire to be" that is more focused on factual journalism (i.e., no commentary), educational programs (especially with Public Universities STEM lectures being broadcasted), educational cartoons, classic music and orchestras, and space/nature/technology documentaries.


This is something outraged rich people tell themselves to feel better about their outrage.


and the ICE news would be that 10% that is important.


> ICE's actions is very relevant and very important to you.

Maybe the first few stories are, but what past masked goons throwing up Nazi salutes and sending people to foreign labor camps do you need to keep up on? If you're into politics, then sure, but your average Joe probably doesn't need to know that they're, yet again, terrorizing people and acting like a secret police force.


Apparently more people need to see more information about those things because they’re still happening


Maybe you need to read more news if you think we have people in charge who'd care about public opposition to the practice.

This is foisting misery on people who have no capacity to affect change.


No capacity to affect change?

Are we forgetting that this specific policy we are discussing was voted in by the public and won the popular vote barely more than a year ago?

I think if more people were legitimately better educated and informed that outcome might not have happened.

The problem is…who is doing the informing and educating? Oftentimes the sources taking up that role are doing so with motives that are not in the people’s best interests.


Wow. Great. Which term is our President on again and can you confirm that time flows linearly and cannot, in fact, flow backwards to undo the election?

The public has no ability to affect change on the policy this Presidency makes. Especially not the public that is predisposed to dislike the President.

This is sadistic and selfish to believe the public must be relentlessly informed of these individual policies that they cannot do anything about. Anything they are informed about present day will almost certainly be forgotten years down the line. But they'll be stressed and unhappy along the way.


Well now you’re moving goalposts by adding specific time periods as qualifiers. So when you made your original statement, you meant to say that the ability to affect change ended recently? And now “This is foisting misery on people who have no capacity to affect change.”

Well, even that isn’t true. The congressional midterms are next year. Control over congress is on the ballot. Turnout will be the decider as it always is.

If “did not vote” was a candidate, it often wins elections.

In addition, local politics happen every year with higher levels of influence per person, and they often directly affect individuals more than national politics.

Going around telling people they have no impact guarantees that outcome.


Considering time does, in fact, move linearly and only in one direction - it's a default. Not a moved goalpost.

And referring to the present in contrast with the next Presidential election - an event thematically related to the previous Presidential election that you referenced - it seemed relevant.

As for what people need to be informed about - they'll inform themselves via increased prices on just about everything due to tarriffs + continued lowered interest rates despite notable inflationary pressures.

I maintain it is cruel to relentlessly and aggressively inform people of the horrors of the world that they - and I repeat myself - cannot do anything about. From news media fewer and fewer trust every year.


effect change


[flagged]


If you were right, it wouldn't be so egregious. Unfortunately, due to lower hiring standards, expedited processes, and a general nonchalance towards the law, plenty of legal immigrants, green card holders, and even natural-born citizens have been wrongfully arrested by ICE because they fit the profile of who they're looking for. Just look up "ICE deports legal immigrant", and you'll find dozens and dozens of stories about various cases involving it.

And regardless of if it's intentional, if it's negligence, if it's just an acceptable margin of error, either way, if you're a legal immigrant, you very much do still have to worry about ICE.


Categorically false. You might need to brush up on current events regarding ICE actions being taken against legal permanent residents and even US Citizens.


This is a lie. I call this a lie because you should know better if you are informed on this subject. I assume that one would be informed to make a statement such as yours.

There are legal immigrants being detained in secrecy for weeks on end with no due process, today, in this country. It is not made up, it is easily verifiable with a quick internet search and a look into one of multiple stories available.


“Lie” I suggest not just reading clickbait headlines. Read the last 2 or 3 paragraphs of story where the writers often bury the inconvenient facts. Such as charges that would invalidate a legal immigrant’s status.

Millions of people who are from other countries are living perfectly fine in the US and not hiding in fear.


How do people get away with this kind of dishonesty today? It's shameful.


There theory might be that an organisation would end up advertising a single prefix, rather than whatever they have now (say 40 networks with various prefixes).

Have you checked to make sure your domain wasn't previously owned by somebody else?

There are sites where you can lookup previous ownership such as https://whois-history.whoisxmlapi.com/


What are you suggesting? That someone owned the domain, lost it, and after losing it tries to create a linkedin account with it?


Maybe they already had an account with that domain years ago and are trying to log back it.

Or perhaps it is just some random spammer creating linkedin accounts with random email addresses

Or perhaps the email doesn't actually come from linkedin and it is a phishing you to click though


> Maybe they already had an account with that domain years ago and are trying to log back it.

This wasn't "log back in", this is a new account created.

> Or perhaps it is just some random spammer creating linkedin accounts with random email addresses

This is what I imagined, but I don't understand why someone would do this.

> Or perhaps the email doesn't actually come from linkedin and it is a phishing you to click though

No, these emails come from linkedin.


The good news if you take 2 years to ship the system "properly" then you won't have to re-factor it because the company went out of business or that product was too late to market.

There is a phrase "million dollar problems". You do stuff at your startup that will take a million dollars to fix because it doesn't scale.

The point is that if your startup doesn't get to that scale then it doesn't matter. If you startup does reach that scale then you have plenty of money/people to spend a million dollars fixing it.


Replies like yours gloss over nuance. I don't mind prioritizing time to market as a programmer; I am not clueless, I understand that imperfect product that pours money into my employer's coffers is infinitely better than it sinking and we all get fired out of necessity.

My problem comes from the fact that the leadership _never_ compromises and never allows us to avoid at least some crises that are extremely easy to foresee (and have happened like clockwork in 95% of the cases where I or other colleagues have predicted them).

Again, sure, let's go to market and start making sales. I completely agree. But scolding a dev for fixing a DB schema anomaly that slows down ~40% of _all_ feature requests and that it took him the grand day or two to do so, is not just myopic. It's moronic.

---

Even shorter / TL;DR version: If the balance of power was 80% leadership and 20% engineers, I'd still be completely OK with that. But wherever I go the "balance" of power is more like 99% leadership and 1% engineers (and that's only when stuff really has hit the fan; they'd take away that last one percent as well if they could).

That is the problem. There's no balance. No compromise. Just people barking orders.


Discussion on the original article:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46064571


I saw an interview with this person. Often the photos of rooms will be taken from the door-frame of the bathroom looking in or out. So not obvious if there is an actual door.


This is where you can practice human interaction and call or email the hotel.


I just feel like this becomes time consuming after a while. Will there be soap? Toilet paper? A bed? You don't know unless you ask! But ... c'mon ... they can just tell you on the website.


Or just don't travel if every detail becomes an issue. I make certain basic assumptions--yes I assume there will be a bed and toilet paper--but, in general, I adapt as necessary.


That is fair. I have noticed doors going missing in hotels but typically travel alone so it didn't really register as an issue. I would not want to share a room with a coworker ever, bathroom door or not.


A former company did have shared rooms for people in Asia-Pacific but it's never been the norm in my experience.


If you’re going on so much travel that this is a burden then you’re truly privileged. Maybe your assistant or travel agent can handle this issue for you.

Jabs aside, you don’t need to be rich to use a travel agent or Rick Steves guidebook instead of blindly booking hotels on Internet sites. If there’s an issue like this you’ll easily find it on review sites and most of those are searchable.

The same thing applies to other experiences like restaurants and museums. For example, it’s always smart to jump on Google/Trip Advisor reviews and type in “kids” or “stroller” into various attractions to make sure you are prepared if you’re bringing kids along.

Travel is never perfect. I’ve been in weird rooms with actual glass walls with a perfect framed view of the shitter facing the bed. I have no idea why they did this, maybe this culture values natural light in bathrooms? I witnessed it more than once so it wasn’t just one creepy place. Individual privacy especially within the same family is something of a recent and western concept from my understanding.

Either way it was hilarious and a minor inconvenience considering it was a lot minute hotel. It’s just peeing and pooping, we all do it. My traveling friend and I took turns averting our eyes. We had warm clean beds and a story to tell.


A few people started using Ruby for command line tools[1] but the community was very focuses around rails. Also Ruby isn't usually part of the standard OS install. So Ruby stayed stuck in it's Rails niche.

[1] Some listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ruby_software_and_tool... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_software_program...


I think it's standard on macOS.


Ironically just now I got a Cloudflare "Error code 524" page because blog.cloudflare.com was down


Sure but OP said that it doesn't even work in trivial cases.

Most of the anti-AI people have conceded it sometimes works but they still say it is unreliable or has other problems (copyright etc). However there are still a few that say it doesn't work at all.


If something isn't reliable, I don't think it works at all. I'm trying to work, not play a slot machine.


Are all the tools you use 100% reliable?

Cause I use things like computers, applications, search engines and websites that regularly return the wrong result or fail


I’m not really sure how you envision AI use at your job but AI can be the extremely imperfect tool it is now and also be extremely useful. What part of AI use to you feels like a slot machine?


damn! with this attitude I’d be left using abacus…


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: