Nearly every game will just work, unless you play a Competitive Game with a kernel anti-cheat. (Looking at you valorant). Https://protondb.com search for the game(s) you play, and hey presto it's fine.
Obviously it's primarily targeted at steam games, Lutris will sort you out with any other windows game (a game manager like steam but for _nearly every_ game)
Do it! Every day Linux is better and better than before, where as windows is... not so good.
Sure there are edge cases like having to use Libre Office instead of Word, but just think of that $100/y saving you'll be having by switching! & Possibly even get a more responsive system!
If you wanted, you honestly could stay on X11 for the next decade. I highly doubt it's going anywhere. Also, no matter what your workflow is, you can write a program to do that. I'd guarantee you could write a small script to automate Wayland to do what you need
Right about now KDE is moving to Wayland. KDE Plasma 6 released a week ago will use Wayland by default, with X11 being an opt in mode. I think that X11 while it might exist for the next decade, it will at best be a second class citizen, at worst a buggy and unsupported mess
Is it technically possible to guarantee program-agnostic mouse gesture support in Wayland? I would sorta expect wlroots to support it, but I don't think that is a safe bet for an arbitrary Wayland compositor.
This is my main issue, I need full access to input devices and the ability to drop, alter and inject new events.
On Windows I fully rely on StrokeIt, it has been a huge improvement for me which I've used for ~15 years.
Linux's easystroke [0] is now deprecated (and always was mediocre) and the modern alternative "mouse-actions" [1] is not good at all.
I've coded a replacement in Rust+C which works for my simple use-case but it targets X11 and it's unclear for me how I can get low level access to input devices events with Wayland. I've also read something about security getting increased in Wayland so that one does no longer have access to input stuff (unclear to me).
Then the nice thing about X11 is the ability to remotely use a X11 session, which apparently isn't possible with Wayland (except for RDP or VNC which isn't what I need).
> ... and it's unclear for me how I can get low level access to input devices events with Wayland.
You can't as far as I know, the reason it has taken more than a decade to gain adoption is the protocol design turned out to be unusable for desktops (at least, probably other platforms too). I've been avoiding it because Zoom & friends didn't work when I tested them. My understanding of the de-facto situation is that everything sucked for about a decade from the release, then (special mention to Drew DeVault) people started extending the Wayland protocol to cover the original design mistakes.
Documentation is available [0]. If I were trying to understand the state of play for mouse gestures I'd probably start by researching what is going on the wlroots project, that seems to be where a lot of the useful innovation was coming from. The extensions implemented in the compositor look like they matter a lot.
Zoom and friends didn't work, because they thought they can grab root window content and run with it. By a chance it did work in X11 due to how PC hardware worked and thus Xorg organized it's framebuffer, but doesn't neither Wayland (for obvious reason), nor when hardware uses it's newer features, like overlays. Even on other platforms, they have to ask, and the user might permit that. They just didn't bother to ask on Linux (it is done via pipewire), and didn't bother to fix their approach.
But that gets back to the basic issue here - the answer to "how should Zoom take screenshots if someone is using a Wayland compositor?" turns out to be "Well, you needed to implement a separate server that re-imagines video as streams, like PulseAudio. Then they have to interface with that. Of course, Wayland doesn't support that (it explicitly makes it hard, in fact), so someone needs to design a protocol extension [0] first to make all this work".
That is a very complex answer. On X, the answer is "grab the relevant window". I can see why Zoom gave the whole mess a pass until the community sort themselves out. I'm doing the same thing; although it looks like (checks) 15 years of patience has been rewarded and Wayland isn't too much of a backslide from X servers.
Unfortunately automating I/O still isn't all that clear, I'd have clicking automated before I move over; it probably is possible but it is just a messy situation to figure out how.
[0] Technically not a Wayland extension, they bypassed the entire system. So now "Wayland compositor" tells us nothing whatsoever about whether the system can take screenshots, but we have to look up compositor-specific support for screencapture. The situation is ... technically better than X, but still silly. They could have avoided years of wasted time by just acknowledging that people want to intercept data as part of the protocol. The situation is a mess and it is silly that we can't have generic Wayland screenshot applications.
The thing is, just grabbing the root window didn't work for 100% either. Outside of the permission problem, there were others: at first, people noticed, that the mouse cursor is missing, so the screen grabbing apps had to handle that as an extra (get the cursor shape, it's position, superimpose it on the from previous step pixmap). Then, if you happened to use Xv, the content was missing too, you got the chroma key used instead. This use case was never handled while Xv was used, the problem was solved when it became obsolete.
The point is, you either implemented a quite complex way to get a screenshot, or just used another implementation as a library. For a screencast, you discover a new here-are-lions land, since you are going to read out VRAM for each frame, with corresponding "speed" and CPU load.
So yes, separate server handles that and more for you. Compositors finally can use overlays (that's how they emulate different scales or resolutions for clients like games, while using native resolution of the display). Pipewire/gstreamer implement a hardware accelerated, zero copy screencasting for you, so you don't have to do it yourself, just call the right portal.
Yes, apps have to change. But they already do change, at least on other platforms. Apple does way more changes in their system, and do you see anyone waiting for several releases until they update? They changed their arch for christ's sake, and except for the long tail, everyone updated within few months. Why it is so difficult on the linux side?
Maybe the reason is not that it is difficult to update, but that the linux users accept crap and apple users don't. Do not accept crap by the proprietary vendors, and they will step up their effort. It's that simple.
> I've been avoiding it because Zoom & friends didn't work when I tested them.
If you are talking about screen sharing Zoom, Meet and Slack work fine on Debian stable running Wayland in KDE and Gnome. Teams probably doesn't work on Wayland, but then Teams working on any other platform on a given day is at best a lottery.
As a non American, I was unable to learn what this was about due to a forced Regional Popup which made me to go a local reseller (which of course, did not have any listing for the brand new item)
Ritualistic hazing of newcomers is a large part of american "frat" culture.
What the parent is likely referring to is: Things like "Wearing the noogler hat" or the hoops you jump through in interview (that have nothing to do with the job) are similar in spirit to some university fraternities admission processes, or are depicted as such in media.
Yes, also the latent class filtering, and the general "coked-up fratbro" behaviors, like enthusiastically and energetically pursuing ideas that make no sense. (No sense includes hiring for people who obsessively focus their time on memorizing and rehearsing for the rituals to get into that one frat.)
Back in 2013-15 I was fortunate enough to know some people at BoM, specifically done IT people.
Their off hand comment around why BOM didn't have https was due to the amount of overhead and infrastructure changes needed to make that https change.
Fast forward to 2018ish they recently created a new API, and a new website. Https://Weather.bom.gov.au with https enabled!
(which I now have integrated into a raspberry pi and an eink display for my morning weather).
For whatever (archaic) reason the new weather webui is now defunct but the api still exists, uses https, and as far as I know supports their mobile applications.
All it would take is for some ISPs here to mitm the traffic with ads / junk and maybe they would change it. The upside to this story is that it is currently a great site to visit for captive portal detection.
Certigo is ZeroSSL for all intensive purposes (as far as I am concerned) so probably close to all of them were acme clients.
Digicert has been pushing acme for a while now, but it's a bit annoying as you (my company) needed to prepay/have a line of credit for it, or some annoyance that didn't make it as seemless as LE/ZeroSSL.
I think for digicert any of the certs with 89/90 day expiry would be acme renewals with a near 100% certainty.
I don't have a definite reason you (or anybody in particular) should choose Digicert but I can give you a couple of ideas of where technically they might be a good choice and ISRG (Let's Encrypt) are not.
Firstly there may be policy issues and you can pay Digicert to care whereas you can't pay Let's Encrypt to care about your problems. Meta for example pays (paid?) their issuer to obey their private extra requirements on top of the rules for the Web PKI when it comes to names in the famous facebook.com 2LD.
Secondly trust issues. Obviously for a mainstream browser or similar, ISRG are trusted, but maybe you've got a fleet of Multi-function Printers from 2015 across 54 offices and alas none of them trust Let's Encrypt for the TLS servers. Yes, this was a dumb purchase but you don't have a time machine and the people who maintain this fleet keeps telling you the next version will definitely fix it, so meanwhile you're buying Digicert certificates.
This is admittedly a rare use case, but is needed e.g. for setting up a DNS-over-HTTPS server.
ZeroSSL seems to support IPv4 SANs, but fails to validate IPv6 addresses; I tried emailing their support several times about this but they never replied. I finally got a working certificate via GeoCerts (https://www.geocerts.com/), a DigiCert reseller, but doing so required manual validation. For the record, GeoCerts support was fantastic.
Obviously it's primarily targeted at steam games, Lutris will sort you out with any other windows game (a game manager like steam but for _nearly every_ game)