I got stuck at a table with a Fox News viewer who was absolutely angry about the "situation" in England and Europe. He was so focused on the Muslim immigration epidemic causing people to be unsafe and was greatly concerned about how they treat their women. Yes, I see the irony of a fox news viewer being concerned about how women are treated.

It was eye opening to me just how deeply brainwashed these people are. This wasn't just him parsing news events, it was his world view being shaped with the opinion that these are awful, dangerous, unsafe places, ridden with crime and poverty.

Wait. Is that what's happening here? Are they expecting the international criminal to be given a right to privacy until he's convicted?

It implies to me they _shouldn't_ be releasing his name. In this case it sounds like they very much should be naming him.

Using superpowers in brainstorm mode like the parent suggested would have resulted in a plan markdown and a spec markdown for the subagents to follow.

Dunno man, Claude had a spec (pretty sure I asked it to consider and outline both options first) or at least clear guidance and decided to YOLO whatever it wanted instead.

It’s always “you’re using the tool wrong, need to tweak this knob or that yadda yadda”.

Superpowers, Serena, Context7 feel like requried plugins to me. Serena in particular feels like a secret weapon sometimes. But superpowers (with "brainstorm" keyword) might be the thing that helps people complaining about quality issues.

I feel like these missions are just paving the way for billionaires to have a new vacation spot.

If you look at the healthcare space, you will realize interoperability only exists because it was mandated by government programs that the patient owns their data and must be provided timely access to all of that data; and also defines specifies the format of that data (open source definitions).

You might also define "exists" in some sort of way that makes sense. And you can also realize that payers are encroaching on every aspect of interoperability data exchange.

It was mandated because, in some cases, getting data from the patient is actually harmful. A CT scan is not benign. So to ensure that CT scans from manufacturer A could be read on a review station of manufacturer B, the DICOM standard was created.

But there is a real health element to it. Although I perfectly agree that standards are good for the consumer, the incentives here are not as strong.

There are also similarly a lot of controls mandated on who they cannot give the data to. It isn't like health records are an open free for all.

I know nothing about IT project management for healthcare, but just the other day over here in the local news there was a mention that the all-singing-all-dancing healthcare application that the region (with ~1M inhabitants) has been spending years and around 800 million euros to get into production has been so poorly received that they're considering starting over from scratch. I'm so happy seeing my tax money well spent...

This is an implementation of something called MUMPS, which is apparently some US system that is very arcane but widely used.

Again, I'm not an expert on this topic, but it indeed seems like standards, API's, file formats and whatnot would be keys to a system where decoupled components can be evolved step-by-step over time instead of the current system which seems to be a humongous monolith.

Which sounds crazy to me considering how much involvement the US has with FHIR.

http://hl7.org/fhir/

Even if you don't care about this stuff, FHIR is definitely worth investigating.

Unfortunately that might be all he gets out of it. He apparently lost the civil suit for damages to his house and the stolen property.

I don't think this is "better" for him really. He didn't win any money afaik. He spent a lot of time defending himself against something that could have easily gone in a different direction given a different jury.

It's publicity and positive public perception for a guy who had one hit song decades ago. This is good market for him.

Many providers report that dealing with Medicare has clear rules they can follow while dealing with private payers causes a huge burden.