I agree with the sentiment regarding the keywords. I tried for a few minutes to read your on-page copy and distill your products keywords but found it difficult. It could be that I'm not familiar enough with the space/problem that your service addresses. I'd be inclined to identify your competitors and the keywords for which they rank. If a set of keywords can be identified I'd then use Google Keyword Tool to determine a set of keywords to target (i.e. those that you have a shot at ranking well for).
Agreed...I have found this difficult too. I guess the issue I keep having is sure I want to appear in the search results for the keywords that my competitors appear in - but at the same time I want to differentiate myself.
I get the desire for differentiation, it's important otherwise why would someone choose your product over another. I think it's key though to better understand the words that your competitors are using to describe the problem/space coupled with the words that consumers are using to describe the problem/space. Understanding this word-scape will help you to better craft your on-page copy along with identifying the words that best describe your unique value proposition.
I'd also consider studying/contacting the twitter followers of your competitors. That would be a direct method of identifying solid potential leads.
Who are your competitors? Can you give me links to at least 3 of them?
I've had a great experience with them so far. I'm on their smallest plan, $4.99 (50 pages sent/received months, I think?), and I get my own local number. Admittedly I don't send many faxes, but when I've needed to send or receive them the service has been great. The document editing tools are awesome, as well.
You might consider at some point in the future (when the backlog of essential work dies down) doing some testing on the impact of displaying the dollar symbol versus the pound symbol in the screenshot of the app. Or better yet based on ip show a screen shot with the currency symbol that is most likely to be applicable.
You've still failed to correctly apply associativity, unfortunately. You're treating 2(9+3) as a single unit, but ÷ appears before the implicit multiplication between 2 and (9+3) and so should get evaluated first. The division should get simplified first with its immediate operands, 48 and 2. This yields (48÷2) * (9+3).
It's funny, the top Google result for [juxtaposition precedence] is exactly this question, posted on the PhysicsForum boards. 2 is actually leading 288 by a hair there.
Anyway, the answer depends completely on whether you believe that multiplication by juxtaposition has the same precedence as multiplication by explicit symbol. There're good reasons to believe it doesn't, eg. the first post on that linked thread, but whatever the answer, it's entirely based on typographical convention. I don't work in the community that cares, so I don't really have an opinion, other than to point out it's not as cut-and-dried as virtually ever poster here believes.
In the community that I do work, people who write parsers, things like this have to be explicitly specified. That's why I maintain that the correct answer is "syntax error".
the real answer is that thw juxtaposition rules are made up on the spit by people trying to rationilze their incorrect answer . there is not and never had been a n "implit mulitplication" rule in the irder if operations.
"I would work from home sometimes and have days off pretty much anytime I like (within reason)."
I would strongly suggest that you get the working from home piece in writing and I'd also have the amount of vacation specified in writing. It's important for you to be able to point to a contract and not just a verbal discussion should you need to. You want to be able to enjoy your vacation and not feel guilt or pressure not to take it.
I realize Excel is fairly ubiquitous and can get certain jobs done but I can't help but cringe at some of those IF statements and the maintenance that must go into some of these sheets.
If you find you've reached the Excel Ninja level you might want to start checking out some other tools. I'd suggest Python.
Either way nice write up. I'm sure people will find it very useful.
When I visited http://3pics.me/1 my first response was to click on the text that said "Click to vote for pic X!" as opposed to clicking on the pic itself.
