They do not threaten to ban Meta. Just the opposite. Meta threats to quit Europa (That is just words actually). Meta could work without moving data to the USA.
They say they cannot - so current legislation is threat of a ban. And the imaginary poll would probably give very different results, depending on the wording:
"Should a exception for meta be made?"
vs.
"Should meta be banned fron operating in europe, for not following regulations"
People do not like exceptions for big companies, but they also do not like extra work and they usually do not like regulations from the EU, either
It's completely unrelated? SeExpr is a language for generating pixels in interesting ways, originating with Disney. Generic scripting is provided through Python, but SeExpr is fun for fill/generator layers.
SeExpr is great and used a lot in animation / shader development in things like Renderman from Pixar, it was great to see it in Krita https://wdas.github.io/SeExpr/
For reference, SeExpr is only used for a certain amount of scripting (usually around pattern generations etc). It's an industry standard in visual effects and animation workflows and was created by Disney;
http://wdas.github.io/SeExpr/
It is not used for general purpose scripting, for which Krita allows you to write Python scripts instead.
I tried the software and then when I opened an app the screen became full of windows. Never seen that before. I have to stop the computer.
So I desinstalled it. That seem a good reason to not use it to me.
The alternative would have been not using Java at all. That would have made attracting programmers more difficult at the beginning of the Android platform, but then, Java would have disappeared on mobiles, at least.
I do not discuss why Oracle thinks is entitled to have of big chunk of the revenues of Android and the work of Google.
If consistency if so important, why do we have: function, func, fun, fn, def, etc... depending the author?
For clarity, use "function", for simplicity use "fn", other forms are just fancy.
If consistency if so important, why do we have: function, func, fun, fn, def, etc... depending the author? For clarity, use "function", for simplicity use "func", other forms are just fancy.
