there are some diffusion text models.

That is logically equivalent to a serial token prediction engine. If you have a diffusion text model you can use it to implement a serial token generator and if you have a serial token generator you can use that to implement a diffusion-generated text string. Don't think about the efficiencies of that, it is an upsetting idea (eg to generate N tokens, the serialising model might recalculate the same string N times from an input and emit one token of it each time - rather wasteful).

It is similar to how everything ends up being Turing complete. Any prediction system has to be equivalent to some sufficiently complicated text generation system to describe the prediction. And any text-generation system has to be equivalent to a sufficiently complicated model that serially emits tokens.

they're gonna start making you log in on old to combat scrapers.

I’m good with that. Wanting usable design is not related to avoid logging in.

and then you ride in the street and drivers yell "get on the sidewalk" and try to hit you.

That isn’t the fault of the sidewalk users, don’t make it their problem.

I went to the seattle zinefest a couple years back and it was so fun.

using them you kind of get a feeling for skill level and can extrapolate that better than juiced benchmarks.

methadone is not a less harmful substitute, it's just the one that makes official people money. the withdrawals are worse.

please don't speak of the mentality I'll like we are subhuman.

rock over london rock on chicago! pontiac we build driving excitement

different cultures have different views on disclosing vulnerabilities to distros before the public?

Yes :) The blackhatter would obviously sit on it until they can sell it or use it, the whitehatter collaborate the kernel and distros to patch, and the greyhatter argues on HN whether the latest *fail was responsible enough or not.

Yes? "Different cultures" doesn't just mean different countries; there are many cultures within infosec.