I agree the article could include more data around the frequency and size of these kind of trades around other events and for a longer period.

However as the article notes the time and size of this particular series of trades makes it look suspicious and that’s all one can say with certainty at this point.

I'm happy with "very suspicious". But IMO you need more to title an article "Treason in the Futures Markets: People close to Trump are trading based on national secrets" based on "very suspicious".

Or the settlements goes to the state and no one ever sees a dollar.

She’s satirizing the irony of a wealthy ceo’s tone deafness while communicating decisions that adversely affect workers while preserving their own lavish lifestyles. Sounds like she was living out the no BS culture.

The title doesn’t capture the mood of page. Maybe:

Dead internet theory confirmed, Digg the latest victim

Just because it’s not enforced doesn’t make it legal.

His M.O. is to accuse his opponent of the very thing he is doing. It’s the party of bad-faith.

Share

It’s easier to use psyops and cause fear and uncertainty.

People are sensitive to video. Looks at the reaction from the Ring Super Bowl commercial and Nest Camera video retrieval news from a few weeks ago.

Your phone and watch are spyware mostly just spying on you. Sure they could be used to spy on others but the directness of an always on smart glass camera lens in one’s face is a little more jarring.

That's why ICE wears masks and cops don't like being filmed.

The lack of the later leads to the former.