Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rubin55's commentslogin

This is great! I just made an AUR package for it: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mistral-vibe


100% with you, but I don't think the presidential whims were the instigator for all this madness. That could be a Howard Lutnick:

The Man Behind Trump’s Tariffs Strategy: https://archive.is/llGGR

Update: fixed link


Lutnick's sons are betting against tariffs at his former firm, so yes it's a corruption play. Tariff everything, then have your family buy up tariff rebates in the chaos because you know they'll get reversed by the courts.

https://www.wired.com/story/senators-probe-cantor-fitzgerald...


Peter Navarro is also a driving force behind the tariffs.


True on Lutnick but he is playing into Trump's deeply held belief (despite every data point saying the opposite) that Americans want manufacturing jobs.


That's a good point.

The ones that hit the news (that seem to be motivated by Trump's personal grievances) are probably a small drop in the bucket.



They mention L-Theanin as a possible way to mitigate. Found a review paper about it here[1].

Sounds interesting.

[1]: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9014247/


I run a 13900T unlocked (meaning, it runs 35W TDP at idle, 1.1ghz, but is allowed to peak to 210W for up to a minute, with the hugest Noctua D14something I could fit on it). It runs at ~29c idle, peaks to 80ish celsius at 210W (~4.5ghz over all cores - songle core peaking to 5.3ghz).

For a time I ran it 24/7 without suspend. It's a big system, lots of disks, expansion cards, etc. If it doesn't suspend, and doesn't do anything remarkable, it uses about ~5kWh per day. Needless to say, it suspends after 60 minutes now (my daily energy usage went from ~9 to ~4 kWh).


He unilaterally changed the license and claims he rewrote the GPL parts: https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2024/09/playstation-1-emulator...


Well, then he cannot object to a package containing the GPL code from before the license change.


Does the package even contain GPL code, or any of his code at all? From what I can tell the AUR package is just an installation script that pulls in source from the official git.


The relevant cmake file does this btw:

    if($ENV{DEBUGINFOD_URLS} MATCHES ".*archlinux.*")
      message(FATAL_ERROR "Unsupported environment.")


This is a repost with a better target url, previous submission here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44727438


dang: could you rewrite/change the url? I think the commit link I shared is a better target for this.


The line link failed. It's line 38:

"Refuse to build in Arch package environments. My license does not allow for packages, and I'm sick of dealing with people complaining about things broken by packagers. This is why we can't have nice things."

    if($ENV{DEBUGINFOD_URLS} MATCHES ".*archlinux.*")
        message(FATAL_ERROR "Unsupported environment.")
    endif()
Relevant commit: https://github.com/stenzek/duckstation/commit/30df16cc767297...


Hey, I just wanted to congratulate you with a very impressive release, the software looks amazing, and I think I will give it a try pretty soon. A question: I see only subscription pricing; is a lifetime licence possible, or a licence like the way jetbrains does it (you pay for version, and maintain the right to keep using the version that was available when the license/subscrition expires, you can re-activate any time).

I'm particularly interested in this "field". I've build something similar many moons ago [1], in the same spirit, but much more primitive. I later started a company around an evolved idea, where the structure you sort of see in your screenshots is effectively a DAG with arbitrary depth (we didn't manage to release it unfortunately, complexity overtook us).

In any case, much congratulations + good luck with the launch!

[1]: https://github.com/raaftech/session


Thanks! Yes, you can find lifetime licenses on the pricing page further down. A perpetual fallback license model like jetbrains has does not exist yet. But I could look into this in the future.

It's cool to see that there are also other people in that space. And about the complexity, I definitely know what you mean. It took a long while before this approach even worked and also took a while until it was actually stable. One of the main points of consideration whenever I think of adding something is the added complexity, because it's very important for me to keep that as low as possible. Otherwise I will end up with an unmaintainable workload. There were definitely a few interesting features I discarded to keep the application as lean as possible.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: