I deleted my claude account the day the samples started preaching from the pope’s address and claiming 50% of the jobs will be gone while shamelessly stealing entire corpus of human data without attribution while preaching what you can and cannot do and maliciously degrading model quality.
I hope they either never make it to IPO or crash violently.
I have never yet had a set of words that I have grown to hate so much - “taste” and “moat” being at the top of them.
It is almost always coming from people who have or know about neither.
(Agree with the article’s general sentiment - but just wanted to make this tangential comment)
There are alternative ways to gather telemetry data about your usage, then literally polluting the commit message / PR description of the author. Why even consider doing that in the first place?
Of course - finance is the best domain to depkiy a stochastic parrot which hallucinates and forgets stuff frequently and doesn’t follow your instructions - even with SOTA models. One where you need absolute accuracy and auditabikity.
Sheep mentality hard at work at companies. Just because Google does it (processes, technologies, systems etc), lets also adopt it without thinking whether its relevant in our context and use-cases.
I bet the same devs from these firms who are asking to traverse a minimum spanning tree would fumble at even the slightest variation of the problem appearing in daily life.
I hope they either never make it to IPO or crash violently.