I believe one can use the CC as the primary model driving local agents that use local models

CGNAT is a benefit in disguise

It's your wiki, you do as you please

Laws are only simpler in hindsight

NTSB's primary role is to investigate and they are darn good at it.

Money wasted by the user on a data contract is a gain for the carrier.

That’s a low bar. Like crypto mining for the power company or throwing extra food out at the end of the day is revenue for the trash pickup company!

Agreed, this is almost a textbook example of the Parable of the Broken Window https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window

Mikrotik has a fantastic "Safe Mode" that reverts any configuration changes that abruptly terminate your connection to the router

I wouldn't recommend anyone to yank out physical controls for accessibility purposes.

What's worse is when some service providers simply post a resolved message that is not linked to any outage.

That you experienced. There's tons of things to complain about, vendors being over communicative shouldn't be one of them.

Why are you using restic, when TrueNAS offers native solutions to backup your data elsewhere?

Encryption, deduplication, snapshots. Although if the poster has a zfs based system elsewhere zfs based backups would be fantastic.

exactly because it isn't trueNAS specific I'd imagine