Exactly, they should be rational just like our secular politicians.
"As a Christian growing up in Sunday school, I was taught from the Bible, ‘Those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed.’ And from my perspective, I’d rather be on the blessing side of things.”
- Ted Cruz, a U.S. senator
"There is a reason the first time I shook Netanyahu's hand, I didn't wash it until I could touch the heads of my children."
- Randy Fine, a U.S. congressman
And of course, there's the President of the United States who's known to be completely rational.
> Phishers pay to send the emails. You don't pay to receive no email. So that's the conflict of interest of these businesses.
> The "CA" for email is basically SPF/DKIM/DMARC as extensions but they're kind of useless because all email providers are lying about quarantine mechanisms anyways. Nothing happens if you report an abuse of spam policies.
So it sounds like these email providers simply won't do anything since they're not being paid or forced to do so. I don't understand why there isnt any push from financial institutions? Since access to their customer's accounts is usually the end goal for these phishing emails.
Or maybe the FTC/FCC should step in. Or some legislation is needed to enforce this.
I've used the same email since I was a kid and gave my email to any website that would ask for it without a thought. So now I'm facing the consequences. My email is just my name (which is very common) so I'm fortunate to have it and never wanted to make a new one.
They hit the Ziggurat near Nasaria, Iraq with a rocket and the people responsible proceeded to be wiped off the map by the locals. So probably not going to be too much of an issue there.
reply