Totally understand your point, makes sense, and indeed if the community were to be more supportive with issues/PR it would be very helpful for the project.
Seeing this kind of topic fairly frequently, it would be great to understand the short/mid/long term plan for the project in terms of governance.
I guess we can all agree that having a single maintainer on a +40k stars project with huge adoption (amazing stuff btw) is unsustainable and extremely difficult, and can drive people away from adopting it in big corporations (I've seen a few comments on Github that mention this), and can make early adopters eerie.
I honestly have no idea on how to do that, but some other projects have been able to (fairly) successfully descentralize the development to be able to keep pace with the development.
It's obviously fair and understandable if the long term will still depend entirely on you, being the creator, you obviously have 100% right to do things the way you want, and nobody can argue against that.
I guess it could be helpful to give the community some guidance on what's the idea for the future of project, and whether it will have a more distributed governance or if it will continue being centralized.
Any of those paths is fine of course, I guess it would just help people deciding the framework choice for the future.
Seeing this kind of topic fairly frequently, it would be great to understand the short/mid/long term plan for the project in terms of governance.
I guess we can all agree that having a single maintainer on a +40k stars project with huge adoption (amazing stuff btw) is unsustainable and extremely difficult, and can drive people away from adopting it in big corporations (I've seen a few comments on Github that mention this), and can make early adopters eerie.
I honestly have no idea on how to do that, but some other projects have been able to (fairly) successfully descentralize the development to be able to keep pace with the development.
It's obviously fair and understandable if the long term will still depend entirely on you, being the creator, you obviously have 100% right to do things the way you want, and nobody can argue against that.
I guess it could be helpful to give the community some guidance on what's the idea for the future of project, and whether it will have a more distributed governance or if it will continue being centralized.
Any of those paths is fine of course, I guess it would just help people deciding the framework choice for the future.