My "family" is multiple devices. M networks (hotel, airport, lounge) and N devices means O(M * N) wifi setups, so carrying a known 200g router means I only have to do O(M+N) setups.

But yeah I also have P family so O(M * P * N) would be a headache.

If your home WiFi uses PSK auth like 99.223% of all homes, you can get to 0 setups by using the same WiFi SSID+PSK on your travel router as the one on your home network.

There are variants of this kind that double as and look like a battery charger (which you should claim) but can also repeat and NAT a wireless signal (which you should helpfully omit). Rumor says mudiv2 but I've never used that so can't confirm.

> COE

I tell the juniors it stands for Correction of Employment. Keeps them on their toes.

Yeah, all this chatter about technologies and processes that could have saved this: you don't think someone in all of Korean government knew about that?

The problem is more likely culture, hierarchy or corruption. Guaranteed several principal security architects have been raising the alarm on this internally along with much safer, redundant, secure alternatives that came with an increased cost. And decision makers who had a higher rank/social/networking advantage shot it down. Maybe the original storage designer was still entrenched there and sabotaging all other proposals out of pride. Or there's an unspoken business relationship with the another department providing resources for that data center that generates kickbacks.

Assuming nobody knows how to do an offsite backup or is plain ignorant of risk over there is arrogant.

Yeah, clickbait title for some of us. Should be "Advanced Age Simulation Suit".

You still need to know the language it generates, otherwise you're generating gobbldy gook

    ... if your priority is clear, ad-free, conversational responses
    ... The clutter-free answers from ChatGPT Search
    ... ChatGPT answers because they are so concise and without advertisers
    In a cluttered web, ChatGPT feels like a helpful friend

This will not be its final form, though. I just hope when they get around to monetizing we have a choice between a free, ad-supported option or paid non-ads service.

I think the above is a good idea of what's wrong with python (and Go), because in your example the list comp is evaluated in what seems to be this order:

    FOURTH-> print([THIRD-> v*v for v in FIRST-> reversed(a) if SECOND-> v*v % 2 == 0])

Which is all over the place. I'd rather see:

    a = [1, 2, 3, 4]
    a = reversed(a)
    a = [v*v for v in a]
    a = [w for w in a if a % 2 == 0]
    print(a)

This.

I often use generator expressions for the intermediate values (so I don't allocate a new list for each step), but I find this to be much more readable.

Your comment made me chuckle. It was an interesting inclusion, considering she appears to be in an industry not usually associated with Zig enthusiasts (entertainment). I'd have thought they individually had enough financial independence that a solidarity statement wasn't required, but it's neat to share that your partner is excited about the things you're excited about.

> Perhaps something for @Dang to investigate.

Then email dang? Why bother asking us? We don't have any of this data.