Where do they show that?

Those are inputs, ground truth, and outputs from various methods, not training data. Not sure what their training data is though lol.

Focus, hike, relax, focus, hike, relax, focus, hike...

>fMRI-to-image

Not so impressive compared to EEG.

This is from a paper published back in September btw: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.14030.pdf

Subvocal speech recognition has been going just as long.

Seems like it could just be getting at some phonetic encoding, or even raw audio information. The grammatical and vocab transformations could be accounted for by an imperfect decoder.

Elm can do iterative recursion, which is a thinly disguised loop without side effects.

I googled "iterative recursion " and couldn't find a definition. So is it judt iteration? And then, what languages don't have iteration?

Lol. IMO the difference between an C and Assembly (as between vacuum tubes and the abacus) is really a difference in power, since it allows the same program to be implemented on different architechtures. It's only fair to start calling things convenience wrappers once you get past C. And often enough, an abstraction aimed at convenience leads to a reduction in expressive power.

For a better reading experience, try the pdf: https://journalofillusion.net/index.php/joi/article/view/983...

The article is presenting a Scheme interpreter running in Scheme, compiled to WASM, not a Scheme compiler, but your idea is also cool. The WASM API apparently doesn't need a pre-made file as its input: you can pass raw bytes generated during runtime into the Module constructor, so it would be totally feasible.

When we have the compiler running in Wasm we'll post about that, too. That's the dream.