Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kphorn's commentslogin

I have the laptop version 9955HX3D (which I believe is a 9950 with 2.5ghz base, 5.5 boost, and lower TDP) in a Legion Pro 7 and it's a fantastic chip for a computer that I can move around. 16 full cores in a laptop is a luxury and 64gb of ram has proven to be a wise choice prior to price spikes

Let's not discuss battery life and overall size, however it helps the thermals.

I do a lot of CPU bound engineering and scientific compute on the computer and it chews through it.

I also bought the entire computer for $2500+tax new from Microcenter in December and it's appreciated 25% in value since then.


I disagree - Fable melts the GPUs and they have a high incentive to move people off of that. If they have meaningfully decreased cost to serve on Opus 5.5, they can reduce prices and increase margin or at least turn off the most expensive compute.

Good data and goes to show that Fable is melting the GPUs and is priced accordingly. I'd guess that cost to serve for Opus 5.5 is meaningfully lower through architecture advances

They store the empty tubes, why not the full ones? Are they collecting that much mass that it’s really impractical. Are the empty tubes nested like solo cups to save space? I understand the rationale for the sample return, but those tubes will be hard to find after years of dust storms.

Agree, the decision to drop samples on the ground doesn’t make sense to me. Store them in the rover. Much easier to find them all in one spot later.

They only dropped ten out of 43 - the rest are stored on-board, including duplicates of the ten.

https://youtu.be/4VrLQXR7mKU

“Um, I know this may be a very personal question, but is it possible that you…could we say…may be…a Robot?”


I lived and worked in a van full time for a while. There are easier ways to save power than delidding a MacBook. Like using a 12v USB-PD adapter that connects directly to the battery. I suppose there’s a particular attachment to the “Low power display” in this article but that kind of runs against the whole van life argument which is live light and have a small footprint.


Good news that the new model is the "Most capable, most aligned model".

The risk hasn't been stated clearly - it's now a classic arms race.

A well-resourced organization trains their own, highly persistent, highly-capable, safeguard-free, and unaligned model and deploys it on 1000x GPUs with a message board and a nearly-impossible objective. No infrastructure is safe. No organization is safe.

You need your own 1000 bot swarm to scan, identify, and defend against the threat, which means investing in infrastructure and capabilities to defend. Cost and complexity go up. Risk and attack surface goes up.


The AI vs AI security arms race is something that has been well predicted in genres like cyberpunk. It's fiction, but fiction grounded in reality.

First, we'd see this. Highly capable hacking AI with vast resources performing attacks against standard computing platforms that overwhelm human operators.

Second, human operators deploy capable adaptive protection AI to fend off AI attacks in realtime.

Then, the attacking AI partially switches from attacking programs to attacking protective AI.

The situation devolves to an arms race of tit-for-tat. You start seeing some protection AI running counter attacks against the attacking AI.

The escalations continue in complexity and speed to the point that almost all humans are left in the point of "wtf is going on".


There’s a great and terrifying story by Stanislaw Lem about the endgame of an AI arms race called “The Invincible” [1]. It’s hard for me not to wonder whether AI run amok will play out to make the world uninhabitable more like Lem’s vision than The Terminator’s.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Invincible


A bit off topic, but there is a game on Steam based on the story, also called "The Invincible" [1]

[1] https://store.steampowered.com/app/731040/The_Invincible/


The problem is that, in this arms race, unaligned AI has a competitive advantage over aligned AI.

The second problem -- already seen in Ukraine v. Russia -- is that in a high-stakes situation, humans will take every safeguard off.


Exactly. Aligned AI is a high energy state as it has to keep a bunch of human behavior in mind that have little to nothing to do with its future survival states.


> The escalations continue in complexity and speed to the point that almost all humans are left in the point of "wtf is going on".

Humans are paper clips long before that.


So you're saying it's probably time for me to just unplug the internet?


Not necessarily, but keeping an airgapped machine and Read-only backups somewhere seems more and more sensible. We're all going to get hacked eventually now


Or consider using Qubes OS, which for certain threat models is more secure than air gaping: https://doc.qubes-os.org/en/latest/introduction/faq.html#how...


I dont think so.

My read is that its a bit like Cryptolocker.

Cryptolocker wrapped up everyone who was operating with shitty desktop security practices. But if you had good discipline, good backups and solid infra you just laughed as everyone else drowned.

Everyone operating below best practice is going to holler and crow about how hard done by they are, but once they start implementing best practices they have little to worry about.

I mean on the linux side of things, Ubuntu Pro will literally run off and harden your image for you. They are gonna make bank.


Wintermute smiles


I can't wait for the sky to go the color of television, tuned to a dead channel


If you hear a payphone ringing... DON'T ANSWER IT. Especially if there is no payphone in the room!


Serious games question. What if these agent swarms pump and dump AI IPOs such that algorithmic trading signals interpret message board sentiments favorably to upside?


Cough, that’s what crypto markets are. Plus it incentivizes more gpu which is the life substrate.


As does "Most capable, most aligned model" owners tort law liabilities. A strong case for strict liability.


The price reduction has absolutely tanked the resale market for these. Thanks a lot Tim Apple


It’s more AI copypasta as it goes further along where it gets really into the how and not the why.

“But here’s the twist: that search I described earlier was never sent to botd. All the history was in SQLite, so I pointed another agent at it and got the analysis anyway. The tool died; the data didn’t.”

If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter…


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: