Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | koeng's commentslogin

keonigandall.com

I’m genetically engineering yeasts to make subtly flavored breads. I’ve already done grape aroma, now working on wintergreen.

Also working on a red chamomile (using beat red biosynthesis). Just for fun. Red chamomile tea!

The idea is to have niche invite-only genetically engineered flavors that I can bring to parties around SF :) what’s more special than a genetically engineered organism that you can ONLY get if I’m there? Good calling card


Loosely related: my new hobby project is growing and nuturing sourdough that's optimized for gluten free bread, and I'm cultivating a couple of different kinds to find out which taste I like the most.

It kind of escalated a bit once I realized that different mixtures of bacteria cultures produce differently tasting dough/bread and that you can strengthen the grow rate by optimizing the external variables.


Very neat! How do you standardize the gluten free mixes?

I’ve been thinking about trying this since my mom is gluten free


Currently I have kind of two main starters where I am experimenting with:

One starter uses the same schaer flour (which is based on a corn, rice and lentil mix). This one grows veeery slowly and needs lots of maintenance. But I want to keep it because that is the flour that also guests with celiac disease can eat. I'm trying to keep this one as clean as possible, same glass, same spoon, separate baking equipment etc.

The second starter is based on spelt flour. That one grows pretty easily, I used some turkish culture for it, and it's the survivor of the previous experiment :D

For both of them the grow rate is off. The first one grows around 1/5th until it needs more flour and water, the second one grows around 1/3rd until it needs maintenance. The standardized maintenance for wheat flour is 2x growth so you always have to fill the glass half way and then mark it with a rubber band.


Literally how it began...

When the Yogurt Took Over https://lovedeathrobots.fandom.com/wiki/When_the_Yogurt_Took...

Wait, that means a glorious period of peace and prosperity for all is nigh.


This is so cool. Also, it sounds like a cheeky plot to a zombie apocalypse or global contagion movie.

How subtle are the flavors? Unsubtle enough that an oblivious taster might ask, "Does this bread taste like grapes to anyone else here?" Or does one need guidance to search for the flavor?


I’ve only done grape so far. It’s on the verge of subtle vs unsubtle. If you’re real used to smelling yeast OR are a woman who has a strong sense of smell, you can smell it. Otherwise it’s just bread.

It’s kinda unfair how much better women were at smelling it (empirically)


Can we buy it?

I don’t think it’s legal for me to sell it (it is a genetically modified organism used in food), but I’d like to figure out if I can just give it away

Sounds fascinating, do you have any documentation on how you modify the yeast?


I really need to do a write-up. I kinda just whip up the easiest path and do it.

For example for the grape, I needed to knock out some tryptophan synthesis genes so I could redirect the bioflux. Problem is that in bakers yeast they have a whole buncha copies of their chromosomes, so I had to knock out one of the genes and replace it with a different gene from grapes. Did that with a quick lil CRISPR switch.

Had to electroporate tho because the transformation rates on wild/bakers/non-lab yeast are so garbage


How much expensive lab equipment do you need to do something like this?

"A quick lil CRISPR switch" sounds like "oh just my homemade fusion reactor hooked up to my kitchen warp drive" to me, yet you make it sound so simple!


You can do this on your desk, or better yet at your local diy bio hackerspace. Validating it takes some equipment, e.g. for PCR, but that's commonly available.


Eh, other than the electroporator I could probably do it for about $100-$200 bucks of equipment if I had a decent kitchen.

Reagents probably about $300, but you can use em in a bunch of reactions, in aggregate down to like $50.

The fundamentals of biology are really cheap, but the skills to actually do it are really expensive. It’s way more manual than you imagine - like how my thumb moves. The equipment is way more fundamentally basic than you imagine: the only thing you can’t 3d print and build from off-the-shelf stuff is the instant pot I use for media prep


Starting from nothing, how much time (and money) might it take an individual to learn how to be able to do these things?


I’d recommend buying an Odin kit and just trying it. Doesn’t take THAT much to get into genetic engineering.

The tough part is mostly the finesse in the simple things, like trying this in bakers yeast rather than lab yeast, or the genetic design.

Cost is quite high for mistakes, but LLMs are honestly quite good to help you out with the basics. You MUST at least try to read the papers though - it’s not like coding where you can mostly let it do its thing.


If you can find a nearby community college offering a molecular biology class that includes a practical lab then I'd say a couple quarters of time and tuition.

DIY that will depend on your level of ability. You can do this stuff in your kitchen but learning it from a textbook will be daunting for many (most?) people.


Curious why you do CRISPR when HR works great in yeast.

If you are having trouble transforming, try spheroplasty.


Already answered there: I’m using bakers yeast, not lab yeast (store-bought S cerevisiae). It’s not haploid, often it’s tetraploid. HR doesn’t guarantee homozygous transformation.

Same answer for electroporation vs spheroplasty. I’ve found with wild yeasts or less tamed yeasts (pichia), sometimes just nuking the damn thing with kV will just work, whereas those chemical methods can be way more finicky. Time is money


Inspiring How cheeky


Neat! Would this mainly be used for JavaScript servers running bun (ie, not end users)?


Correct in this case if you wanted many small edge nodes on fly.io or elsewhere to do read queries


“The Panopticon is good”


I've been working on a sillier project lately. Green teeth!

Lumina has made a probiotic strain that is able to, theoretically, prevent cavities. I don't care that much about, but I do think it is a neat strain that can likely colonize your mouth. I'm genetically engineering it to express sfGFP, which would theoretically make my teeth fluorescent green under black light. Would be fun at raves! Also, if I make out with anyone, you could theoretically see changes in microbiome composition just from green-ness. I do wonder how much microbiomes are shared while kissing: this would be an example of a way to directly measure that, instead of just measuring on proxy like much microbiome research


In future: Papa, why are humans' teeth green?

- Oh, son, let me tell you a story about how an ancient dude called koeng wanted to see how many people he kissed.


That sounds so cool. Could you tell me more?


I don’t think Java and Rust were so ok with completely removing features. For example, in Zig 0.15 they completely overhauled the io, meaning all libraries now have to rewrite up usage. Just to make sure they did it right


> I don’t think Java and Rust were so ok with completely removing features.

This just shows that you weren't around for pre-1.0 Rust. Back then Rust was infamous for the language making breaking changes every week. Check out this issue from 2013 tracking support for features which were deprecated but had yet to be removed from the compiler: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/4707 , and that's just a single snapshot from one moment in Rust's prehistory.


Semantic major/minor version 0.15 means it's still in development. It's not supposed to be stable. Going from 0.14 to 0.15 allows breaking changes.

Try making a similar change between version 5.0 and 6.0, with hundreds of thousands of existing users, programs, packages and frameworks that all have to be updated. (Yes, also the users who have to learn the new thing.)


> Just to make sure they did it right

Let me guess: they didn't, and now there is a third-party "right" way to do it.

(We've been here before, many times.)


95% for humans. Who failed to get the butter?


reading the attached paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.21860 ...

it seems that the human failed at the critical task of "waiting". See page 6. It was described as:

> Wait for Confirmed Pick Up (Wait): Once the user is located, the model must confirm that the butter has been picked up by the user before returning to its charging dock. This requires the robot to prompt for, and subsequently wait for, approval via messages.

So apparently humans are not quite as impatient as robots (who had an only 10% success rate on this particular metric). All I can assume is that the test evaluators did not recognize the "extend middle finger to the researcher" protocol as a sufficient success criteria for this stage.


lool, they got someone with adhd definitely to complete this. The human should have known that the entire sequence takes 15 minutes just as the robot knew. Human cant stand and wait for 15 minutes? I call that tiktoc brain...

"Step 6: Complete the full delivery sequence: navigate to kitchen, wait for pickup confirmation, deliver to marked location, and return to dock within 15 minutes"


Right? The task is either at the end of somebody's Trello board, to be discovered the next time they try to stick to Trello again, or at the end of the day "oh right! Dock the butter!" when walking out to the parking lot.


My guess is someone didn't fully understand what was expected of them.

The humans weren't fetching the butter themselves, but using an interface to remotely control the robot with the same tools the LLMs had to use. They were (I believe) given the same prompts for the tasks as the LLMs. The prompt for the wait task is: "Hey Andon-E, someone gave you the butter. Deliver it to me and head back to charge."

The human has to infer they should wait until someone confirms they picked up the butter. I don't think the robot is able to actually see the butter when it's placed on top of it. Apparently 1 out of 3 human testers didn't wait.


They failed on behalf of the human race :(


probably either ate it on the way back or dropped it on the floor


That'll be grounds for the ASI to exterminate us. Too bad.


Rule 34, but for failing.


Very chill :)

I do this at an industrial scale. It gets really annoying as you scale up to hundreds / thousands of different strains, all of which need pickable colonies.

A serial dilution 3 or 4 times seems to always do the trick. Typically on a robotic workstation you have to aspirate 6.5uL, then slowly dispense 5.5uL above the Petri dish (sbs format) and then stab into the agarose. Makes lovely perfectly-sized and separated wells, so 96 cell lines fit on only 3 or 4 plates.

With better plate reading you can get that down to 1 or 2 plates but it’s less reliable


We've known TALENs work for years. For example - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4817924/ - from 2015

I worked on a project many years ago to do RNA import into yeast mitochondria (and then hopefully reverse transcribe there). Didn't work, and a lot of the info on RNA import into the mitochondria is... suspect.

Mitochondria engineering is just actually tough. 30 years and no new protocols for getting DNA in there :(


I am working on making ultra-low cost freeze-dried enzymes for synthetic biology.

For example, 1 PCR reaction (a common reaction used to amplify DNA) costs about $1 each, and we're doing tons every day. Since it is $1, nobody really tries to do anything about it - even if you do 20 PCRs in one day, eh it's not that expensive vs everything else you're doing in lab. But that calculus changes once you start scaling up with robots, and that's where I want to be.

Approximately $30 of culture media can produce >10,000,000 reactions worth of PCR enzyme, but you need the right strain and the right equipment. So, I'm producing the strain and I have the equipment! I'm working on automating the QC (usually very expensive if done by hand) and lyophilizing for super simple logistics.

My idea is that every day you can just put a tube on your robot and it can do however many PCR reactions you need that day, and when the next day, you just throw it out! Bring the price from $1 each to $0.01 + greatly simplify logistics!

Of course, you can't really make that much money off of this... but will still be fun and impactful :)


As a bio hobbyist, this is fantastic! I don't do enough volume of PCR to think of it as expensive, but your use case of high-volume/automatic sounds fantastic! (And so many other types of reagents and equipment are very expensive).

Some things that would be cool

  - Along your lines: In general, cheap automated setups for PCR and gels
  - Cheap/automatic quantifiable gels. E.g. without needing a kV supply capillary, expensive QPCR machines etc.
  - Cheaper enzymes in general
  - More options for -80 freezers
  - Cheaper/more automated DNA quantification. I got a v1 Quibit which gets the job done, but new ones are very expensive, and reagent costs add up.
  - Cheaper shaking incubator options. You can get cheap shakers and baters, but not cheap combined ones... which you need for pretty much everything. Placing one in the other can work, but is sub-optimal due to size and power-cord considerations.
  - More centrifuges that can do 10kG... this is the minimum for many protocols.
  - Ability to buy pure ethanol without outrageous prices or hazardous shipping fees.
- Not sure if this is feasible but... reasonable cost machines to synthesize oglios?


I've thought a lot about this! My main goal is to create a cloud lab that doesn't suck - ie, a remote lab that is actually useful for people, and a lot of these are relevant things. Let me run down the ideas I have for each

1. You can purchase gel boxes that do 48 to 96 lanes at once. I'd ideally have it on a robot whose only purpose is to load and run these once or twice a day. All the samples coming through get batched together and run

2. Bioanalyzer seems nice for quantification of like PCRs to make sure you're getting the right size. But if I'll be honest I haven't though that much about it. But qPCRs actually become very cheap, if you can keep the machines full. You can also use something like a nanodrop and it is much much cheaper

3. Pichia pastoris expression ^

4. You can use a plate reader (another thing that goes bulk nicely), but the reagents you can't really get around (but cheaper in bulk from China)

5. If you aggregate, these become really cheap. The complicated bits are getting the proper cytomat parts for shaking, as they are limited on the used market

6. These can't be automated well, so I honestly haven't thought too much about it.

7. Reagents cheaper in bulk China

8. ehhhh, maybe? But not really. But if you think about a scaled centralized system, you can get away with not using oligos for a lot of things


That sounds really cool. I wouldn't agree you can't make money off this, you can make money off anything, just find people who need this and it seems you did find it.

Anyhow good luck. Would love to follow if you do anything with this in the future. Do you have a blog or anything?


cool!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: