> Do you solve all your problems by shooting people?
All power on earth emanates from the barrel of a gun. We abstract that fact away in modern polite society, but it is the base level truth of our existence.
So yes, when it comes down to it, governments can, will, (and have) used guns to solve this.
Countries don't need wars to shoot people. You make laws and issue executive orders, and when they are violated, you send people to hit the violators with sticks until they comply, and if that doesn't work, to shoot them until they stop moving.
Any and all economic policy is ultimately backed by violence. That's what governments are for.
Great Britain actually did this regularly. For hundreds of years they would war all over europe until they ran out of money, make up some scheme to refill the coffers (including eventually inventing the central bank and other shenanigans with the "South Sea" bubble), and then go back to war in europe.
The beautiful thing about Bitcoin is that it clears transactions every ten minutes and continues to do so until the end of time, and at no point does it care what you think about that.
Four questions - where does a bank store cash? What is the IORB and what are its underlying assumptions? What is the overhead cost in banking? What is the cost of ACH and a wire? I don’t contend you can just have money sit there. I also don’t contend that it was stupid in hindsight to be this levered to duration. But there is an overhead cost in banking.