And, of course, the solution proposed is to bring more AI and "AI literacy" even though:
"Still, 40% of the more than 2,000 teachers polled say they don't use AI at all. And more than half believe weekly use of AI by students would decrease their ability to think independently and critically."
"Another recent survey by Gallup, the Walton Family Foundation and GSV Ventures found that nearly half of Generation Z students think AI will hurt their ability to think about information carefully."
> Check out the full thread and the quote-posts, and you can see I found more such troubling AI-generated ‘definitions’, even embedded via hyperlinks in scientific articles on ScienceDirect.
A lot of discussion, but one contradiction seems to have gone unnoticed; notably, the EU's DMA decision about Apple having to allow alternative app stores. Go figure again about these contradictory moves.
"It seems Anthropic and OpenAI are already engaged. Would it be correct to assume that they will assist in creating the curriculum?
Yes"