"In the cyber security industry, however, marketing is everything. Names are chosen to invoke a visceral reaction and to promote fear. That fear helps to turn people towards expensive high-tech security products."
"Often, the high-tech services that the cyber security sector sells protect the front door, while offenders continue to sneak in the back one using low-tech methods."
No forceful reasons (i.e., do what you want), but they're basically social media style parasites for people who haven't yet discovered pre-print repositories.
"Typically, in 97% of the cases the OP does not change his mind but in about 3% of the cases he does."
Another way to put the "someone is wrong in the Internet" thing.
"This brings us closer to my central argument: the AI's success was'’t due to superior reasoning or a reliance on facts and logic, but rather because it effectively 'hacked' the mechanics of persuasion."
Indeed, and that's what many people here too have been saying for a long time. Though note that with 3% it is all questionable to say the least.
"We were only able to find released code for 6 of these 100 papers, and what's worse, only 6 of the 88 remaining papers contained a specific listing for the algorithm."
"Specifically, they want to focus more on testing validity, which for quantitative social scientists refers to how well a given questionnaire measures what it’s claiming to measure—and, more fundamentally, whether what it is measuring has a coherent definition."
Over again.
reply